Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 09:11 AM Feb 2018

Is Trump laying the groundwork for mass-firings of teachers?

Notice the phrase they all use..."teachers who care about their students"

How do you know who those teachers are?

Easy! They are the ones who want to carry a gun!

And the ones who won't carry a gun - of course - don't care about their students.

These teachers will be replaced with teachers who care/carry

47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is Trump laying the groundwork for mass-firings of teachers? (Original Post) hexola Feb 2018 OP
Unsupported (and unachievable) conspiracy theory. brooklynite Feb 2018 #1
You dont think they will use this tact to promote armed teachers...? hexola Feb 2018 #2
who is "they" in your scenario? onenote Feb 2018 #4
Trump and the NRA and their congress. hexola Feb 2018 #5
Well at least we know that you know nothing about the US education system. onenote Feb 2018 #6
"Trump and the NRA" don't hire and fire teachers, or negate Union contracts. brooklynite Feb 2018 #17
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2018 #8
Why have an MichMary Feb 2018 #15
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2018 #16
Well, MichMary Feb 2018 #18
Do you have a job description for Parkland's school resource officer? struggle4progress Feb 2018 #34
No. Do you? MichMary Feb 2018 #37
I haven't found one for Parkland. But a look, at SRO job descriptions from across the US, struggle4progress Feb 2018 #38
If protecting lives MichMary Feb 2018 #41
Our yammering halfwit of a president has already attacked him; and so has his boss, the sheriff struggle4progress Feb 2018 #44
You're right MichMary Feb 2018 #46
Veteran officer defends Parkland school resource officer's actions, calls him a "scapegoat" struggle4progress Feb 2018 #35
If he was hired MichMary Feb 2018 #36
I haven't seen the county protocols. Do you have a link? struggle4progress Feb 2018 #39
They aren't county by county MichMary Feb 2018 #40
Actual protocols vary from location to location struggle4progress Feb 2018 #42
Okay. I'm sure you're right MichMary Feb 2018 #43
You assume facts not in evidence struggle4progress Feb 2018 #45
The federal government does not employ teachers. jberryhill Feb 2018 #3
Federal Grants fund School Resource Officers hexola Feb 2018 #9
c'mon - how could he fire teachers? DrDan Feb 2018 #7
"Firing" is a bit melodramatic..."professionally discriminate" might be a better phrase. hexola Feb 2018 #12
I am quite confident they will be one of his targets . . . . along with that deputy, and the FBI DrDan Feb 2018 #33
Teachers are hired by local school systems. madaboutharry Feb 2018 #10
Can't and won't happen. Lochloosa Feb 2018 #11
Not enough carrying teachers? - how about Teacher Certification programs...for Police Officers hexola Feb 2018 #13
Just heard a commentator on CNN mention certifying police as teachers hexola Feb 2018 #26
No. n/t MichMary Feb 2018 #14
I don't think so. I DO think he's laying the groundwork to blame teachers for the next shooting EffieBlack Feb 2018 #19
+++++! LastLiberal in PalmSprings Feb 2018 #22
No Proud Liberal Dem Feb 2018 #20
Federal Funds put "Resource Officers" in schools hexola Feb 2018 #29
No ProfessorGAC Feb 2018 #21
You dont know how schools work, do you? Or our government at all Lee-Lee Feb 2018 #23
Fixed it for you: The president has zero ability. FSogol Feb 2018 #24
I am thinking the OP wasn't really thinking it through and just through this out there. n/t Kirk Lover Feb 2018 #25
For sure - "Firing" is a bit strong... hexola Feb 2018 #28
Didn't he say "teachers care about the students, love the students, the guards don't know them" Kirk Lover Feb 2018 #31
Ain't gonna happen. DinahMoeHum Feb 2018 #27
Nothing would be surprising duforsure Feb 2018 #30
trump is an idiot. he has never laid the groundwork for anything other than his profits spanone Feb 2018 #32
Blackwater High lame54 Feb 2018 #47
 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
2. You dont think they will use this tact to promote armed teachers...?
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 09:15 AM
Feb 2018

They will...

Teachers who wont arm...don't care.

Response to hexola (Reply #2)

MichMary

(1,714 posts)
15. Why have an
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 09:59 AM
Feb 2018

armed deputy at the school, making something like $75,000 per year, if he is going to stand outside (with two pistols and a shotgun) while people inside are being killed?

That $75,000 could buy an awful lot of metal detectors.

Response to MichMary (Reply #15)

MichMary

(1,714 posts)
18. Well,
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 10:21 AM
Feb 2018

I did point out that he didn't just have a pistol. He had a shotgun, which could have done a lot of damage.

I think arming teachers is absolutely the dumbest idea to ever come out of the White House, but if we can't expect an armed, trained LEO to do his job when called upon, why have them?

MichMary

(1,714 posts)
37. No. Do you?
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 12:53 PM
Feb 2018

He was issued a gun. There are certain assumptions that go along with that. Like, you use it when you need to in order to protect lives.

struggle4progress

(118,295 posts)
38. I haven't found one for Parkland. But a look, at SRO job descriptions from across the US,
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 01:14 PM
Feb 2018

will show that job descriptions vary widely and may include a large "community outreach" component

The job is not synonymous with "SWAT team member"

MichMary

(1,714 posts)
41. If protecting lives
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 01:42 PM
Feb 2018

wasn't part of his duty as a deputy sheriff, then why did he have a gun? Pretty sure it wasn't to blow away kids cheating on tests.

I really don't understand the efforts to exonerate this guy. He had a gun in an otherwise gun-free zone.He and the shooter were the only ones. He was the only one who had the means to take down the gunman. If he wasn't going to even make the attempt, he should have been put out to pasture and been replaced by someone who would try.

struggle4progress

(118,295 posts)
44. Our yammering halfwit of a president has already attacked him; and so has his boss, the sheriff
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 01:56 PM
Feb 2018

I can't see how the country benefits much if every idiotic nimrod, who (like me) posts anonymously on the innertubes, also denounces the fellow, especially since important details (such as a very accurate timeline) for the overall response aren't being widely published

And the sheriff might be going after the guy to take heat off himself: almost half of the Florida legislature has called for the sheriff's suspension

MichMary

(1,714 posts)
46. You're right
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 02:10 PM
Feb 2018

(especially about the "yammering halfwit of a president" thing. I may use that in the future.)

There is a lot of "not my fault" going on in that department. By total coincidence I've been reading a lot about Columbine lately. Protocols were different then, and law enforcement followed standard protocols as they existed then. But there was still a lot of totally appropriate criticism of local law enforcement.

At the time of the massacre, Eric Harris should certainly been in prison. He had been arrested on a felony charge, but placed in a diversion program. Diversion would have ended if the complaints about him had come to light. But everything, multiple complaints by the Brown family of actual threats, had simply been filed away, a search warrant was never executed (had it been, the pipe bombs would have been found,) and there was no communication between the diversion people, law enforcement, and the school.

The cover-up continued long after the shooting. The records of the prior complaints and the search warrant disappeared, and as far as I know, were never found.

This case reminds me so much of what happened in Colorado in 1999. If the threats had been taken seriously by the FBI, if Cruz had been arrested during one of the 39 visits to his home, if, if, if . . . Seventeen people would still be alive.

The chilling thing about this is that there are probably hundreds of cases where shooters have not fallen through the cracks. We don't hear about those cases, because there has been effective intervention.

Don't mean to have been so snarky with you. I do see where you are coming from, and we are all a bit on edge, with the yammering halfwit in charge.

struggle4progress

(118,295 posts)
35. Veteran officer defends Parkland school resource officer's actions, calls him a "scapegoat"
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 12:43 PM
Feb 2018

Michael Paluska
10:17 PM, Feb 22, 2018
12:47 PM, Feb 23, 2018

... "You don’t say that you are wrong, that’s why 17 children died," Diamond said. "You can’t do that to an individual" ...

"I think this is such a volatile and tragic scenario that everybody, everybody is going to overreact, everyone's going to look at somebody to put the finger on ... I think it's inappropriate, I think that's scapegoating the deputy,” Diamond said.

There are also questions about why a tip to the FBI about Cruz fell through the cracks. Diamond says taking all of the failures in their totality don't fall on one deputy ...


https://www.abcactionnews.com/news/local-news/veteran-officer-defends-parkland-school-resource-officers-actions-calls-him-a-scapegoat

MichMary

(1,714 posts)
36. If he was hired
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 12:52 PM
Feb 2018

to "handle issues with tact and judgment," then why did he have a gun? Post-Columbine protocols include officers, even if there is only one, to go toward the gunfire in an effort to save lives.

He probably wasn't the right person for the job, or maybe his training failed. Whatever. He was there to protect lives, and he didn't do it.

MichMary

(1,714 posts)
43. Okay. I'm sure you're right
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 01:45 PM
Feb 2018

the Broward County protocols must include standing around and waiting for another department to come in and save the day.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
3. The federal government does not employ teachers.
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 09:16 AM
Feb 2018

Perhaps some day you can visit the US and learn about how our schools work.
 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
9. Federal Grants fund School Resource Officers
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 09:21 AM
Feb 2018

Federal money can influence.

I live in South Central PA - ground zero for nitwits likely to support arming teachers.

 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
12. "Firing" is a bit melodramatic..."professionally discriminate" might be a better phrase.
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 09:23 AM
Feb 2018

Yes - being a bit dramatic.

Trump likes to take credit for everything...I like to blame him for everything!

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
33. I am quite confident they will be one of his targets . . . . along with that deputy, and the FBI
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 12:31 PM
Feb 2018

madaboutharry

(40,212 posts)
10. Teachers are hired by local school systems.
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 09:22 AM
Feb 2018

They work for local school districts. They are not federal employees.

 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
13. Not enough carrying teachers? - how about Teacher Certification programs...for Police Officers
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 09:41 AM
Feb 2018

A little federal incentive and bam - armed "teachers"

It won't happen overnight...

 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
26. Just heard a commentator on CNN mention certifying police as teachers
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 11:40 AM
Feb 2018

I'll try to source that...about 15 minutes ago.

 

EffieBlack

(14,249 posts)
19. I don't think so. I DO think he's laying the groundwork to blame teachers for the next shooting
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 10:28 AM
Feb 2018

I can hear them now. "This could have been prevented if a teacher had a gun. But the TEACHER's UNION REFUSED! They let these kids die."

22. +++++!
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 11:12 AM
Feb 2018

I wrote about the same thing: https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=1997963

The Republicans have a long history of blaming public school teachers (and their union) for all of society's ills. Of course, the GOP/NRA/Trump solution is the most simplistic and least likely to work (according to a 2008 study, during an active shooter confrontation police officers hit their intended target 18% of the time), but it serves the NRA purpose of selling more guns, the GOP's purpose of gaining another attack point against the teachers, and Trump's desire to be BMOC -- "Only I can arm the teachers, no one else has done it!"

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,414 posts)
20. No
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 10:33 AM
Feb 2018

As others have pointed out, he doesn't have that kind of authority. I suppose that it is possible that Congress or the states could pass laws requiring teachers to carry but IMHO there would be MASSIVE resistance to such a proposal and it would go nowhere fast. I'm heartened by the fact that teachers everywhere are actually already pouring cold water all over that idea.

ProfessorGAC

(65,076 posts)
21. No
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 11:11 AM
Feb 2018

A ridiculous extrapolation from the available information, even given the sliminess of that gang in DC.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
23. You dont know how schools work, do you? Or our government at all
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 11:34 AM
Feb 2018

The hiring and firing of teachers is done at the local level and policy set regarding that at the highest at
State level.

The president has zero authority or ability to fire anyone who works for local or state government.

 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
28. For sure - "Firing" is a bit strong...
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 11:47 AM
Feb 2018

But - I hear this phrase "who care about their students" being used by Trump, Ivanka, and I think Slurah Slanders.

This is a top down effort...i.e. "Firing"

How they achieve this - I don't know - but someone on CNN mentioned giving police officers a path to a teaching certificate.

Thats one way...

 

Kirk Lover

(3,608 posts)
31. Didn't he say "teachers care about the students, love the students, the guards don't know them"
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 11:55 AM
Feb 2018

something to that effect. But this whole arm the teachers thing also comes down to money. A lot of money is to be made to outfit and train all those teachers. Who will benefit from this STUPID idea? The gun industry and the NRA will. I believe it is no coincidence that he is pushing this bullshit.

All I know is that I was away with my Trumper sister while this was going on and she was horrified...HORRIFIED, to hear this trashbag float this 'idea'. She works in a school - she knows just how insane that would be. She is disgusted and let him just keep keeping on because I'm telling you he is shedding support one person at a time..but just like his hair....he's shedding. He is done in every single way.

duforsure

(11,885 posts)
30. Nothing would be surprising
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 11:55 AM
Feb 2018

And he may try to use to it to break their union, which he'll soon be going after that with the postal people , police , firemen, and any other government jobs that have unions. They want to privatize all government sector jobs. That way they can shake them down for campaign contributions, or give the contracts to someone who will.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is Trump laying the groun...