Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

jodymarie aimee

(3,975 posts) Fri Feb 23, 2018, 05:44 AM Feb 2018

2,182 mph..that's how fast the bullets traveled...

per Lawrence last nite.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

2,182 mph..that's how fast the bullets traveled... (Original Post) jodymarie aimee Feb 2018 OP

. . . . Sophia4 Feb 2018 #1

Sh*t brettdale Feb 2018 #2

this is what it does to ballistic gelatin: Spider Jerusalem Feb 2018 #3

And Trump wants more weapons duforsure Feb 2018 #4

Sophia4

(3,515 posts)

1. . . . .

Reply to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Fri Feb 23, 2018, 05:47 AM

Feb 2018

brettdale

(12,382 posts)

2. Sh*t

Reply to Sophia4 (Reply #1)

Fri Feb 23, 2018, 05:56 AM

Feb 2018

Imagine what that does to a body.

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)

3. this is what it does to ballistic gelatin:

Reply to brettdale (Reply #2)

Fri Feb 23, 2018, 06:40 AM

Feb 2018

duforsure

(11,885 posts)

4. And Trump wants more weapons

Reply to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Fri Feb 23, 2018, 08:12 AM

Feb 2018

which breeds more acts of violence is his answer. The bullets are designed to do massive damage to the body, as well as the assault rifle is designed to deliver them at a incredible speed, and instead of banning them again, which did lower the amount of people being killed, he goes the NRA path, weaponize more people. These weapons like this are for killing people as quickly as they can, and trump and republicans are ok with it. Disturbing, and grounds for removal from office. When politicians are protecting themselves over the American people, things have to change. This has gone on for too long now.

Reply to this discussion