General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBreaking: Stoneman Douglas School resource officer "never went in" once the shooting started
https://wsvn.com/news/local/sheriff-israel-stoneman-douglas-resource-deputy-resigns-amid-investigation/
FORT LAUDERDALE, FLA. (WSVN) - Broward Sheriff Scott Israel has announced that the school resource deputy for Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School has resigned amid an internal investigation.
Snip
However, said Israel, video showed a deputy arriving at the west side of the building where the shooting took place, taking up a position and never going in.
The cop wouldn't do anything but we should've armed the teacher.
unblock
(52,253 posts)lunasun
(21,646 posts)In an interview with the Times, Coral Springs Officer Burton said Deputy Peterson was seeking cover behind a concrete column leading to a stairwell.
appal_jack
(3,813 posts)"You don't need a gun,, the police will protect you!"
Actually, they probably won't. Most likely, they will not be nearby when you face a threat. They will show up to make a report, and if you are lucky, pursue the criminal after the fact. And if they do happen to be around, their priority is to usually protect themselves. While this particular deputy was shamed into resigning (while close enough to retirement that it probably does not matter much), the Supreme Court has already ruled that police officers have no absolute duty to protect members of the public.
-app
unblock
(52,253 posts)i haven't searched du extensively for that particular "trope" but i don't think very many people here at all are thinking that one barney fife with six bullets is much of a defense against someone with enough firepower to take out the entire football squad in a few minutes.
mostly we're trying to figure out how to keep these tragedies from happening in the first place, not trying to figure out how to get more arms to counter it when it does happen. most people here are roundly rejecting the idea of more arms at schools.
but by all means, feel free find a way to use this to push your point.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)remove guns from the public spaces and put them in the regulated militias per the Constitution.
fierywoman
(7,685 posts)Red Mountain
(1,733 posts)Yes.
We have failed in that regard. Not a little bit. Completely. Abjectly.
And some fucking losers still want to pretend we are honoring the vision of our founding fathers.
fierywoman
(7,685 posts)brush
(53,787 posts)None of the gun nuts can even argue with what the Constitution says.
BigmanPigman
(51,608 posts)The parents of victims are naturally furious.
malaise
(269,050 posts)I got the impression that Peterson is approaching retirement age and resigned when suspended for that reason.
My question is why was the SRO someone approaching retirement age and what weapon did he have to take on a student on the rampage with an AR-15.
Was he a coward- I don't know.
DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)This deputy never in his wildest dreams thought he would have to confront an active shooter situation. He was going to have a nice cushy job his last few years on the force and then retire. Didn't quite work out that way.
malaise
(269,050 posts)this senseless slaughter
busterbrown
(8,515 posts)I wonder how many here with professional training, would have jumped right into the fire with little knowledge of what actually was going on...
And you say he was approaching retirement? Another factor..
Another Concern? This incident will make great fodder for the NRA... Every scapegoat they can find..
I agree with your last statement
SoCalMusicLover
(3,194 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)SoCalMusicLover
(3,194 posts)Aren't they?
whathehell
(29,067 posts)madaboutharry
(40,212 posts)It is during horrible events we discover who are the cowards and who are the heroes.
The three coaches and teachers gave their lives to save their students. They probably didn't know that about themselves until that moment.
malaise
(269,050 posts)of their presence? Ban the effin' weapon.
busterbrown
(8,515 posts)SRO's were probably created for the troublemakers and discipline problems..
When he took the job years ago...He probably could have never foreseen this type of situation!
malaise
(269,050 posts)This is madness
brush
(53,787 posts)for more guns to protect us from the multitude of guns pouring into the streets.
It's the complete opposite of sanity.
This shooting might be the tipping point to restore some sanity around this question of unfettered access to guns being a right.
malaise
(269,050 posts)This has to stop - children are terrified to go to school so gun-humpers can own AR-15s.
hatrack
(59,587 posts).
UpInArms
(51,284 posts)A fundraising site says Anthony Borges was shot in both legs and his back while attempting to close and lock a classroom door last Wednesday. Seventeen people were killed.
Borges' friend Carlos Rodriguez told ABC's "Good Morning America" that the two rushed to hide in a nearby classroom when they first heard gunshots. He says no one knew what to do, but that Borges "took the initiative to just save his other classmates."
madaboutharry
(40,212 posts)appalachiablue
(41,144 posts)OhNo-Really
(3,985 posts)I can't criticize an old cop facing an AR-15.
I can criticize the proponents of semo-automatic weapons. May they all rot in hell.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)nolabear
(41,986 posts)I certainly wouldnt wish it on him but thats the deal.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)A lone security guard isn't much of a defense if people are coming in with assault rifles.
exboyfil
(17,863 posts)should be able to handle any threat with their Glocks.
/sarcasm
yardwork
(61,650 posts)malaise
(269,050 posts)Outlaw the weapon.
How could this man have known where the fire was coming from and what to do. Or how many gunmen were involved.
He did the best he could in a terrible situation. If he had chased down the killer, all that would have happened was that he would have been killed. I expect he called for help.
I don't blame this man one bit. Security guards in schools can't prevent this kind of violence they just happen to be in the right hallway - or the right room and 'get a lucky shot.'
whathehell
(29,067 posts)FarCenter
(19,429 posts)milestogo
(16,829 posts)was probably worth more to save lives than anything he could have done. As a security officer he would have been shot first.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)lapfog_1
(29,205 posts)armed with a handgun... 6 shot revolver or maybe more in a magazine
I might... I don't really know. I've never been in a fire fight.
I don't think anyone knows until you are in the situation.
I don't think it would have made a difference.
livetohike
(22,145 posts)must feel is unimaginable.
lapfog_1
(29,205 posts)and if he knew ahead of time that he was and is a coward he shouldn't have taken the job.
I'm saying that I might have gone in... given that I signed up for it. Hell, I might have gone in if I was a teacher there or just a passerby.
We will never know if it would have made a difference or if it only would have meant 18 dead and one more "hero" burial.
What it points out is that even if we arm 10 teachers at every school or station more police at the high schools... it may not matter.
BTW, there was an armed SRO at Columbine too... he even shot at Eric Harris but failed to stop him or even hit him (from 60 yards or a little over half a football field... shot at him while Eric was reloading)
nolabear
(41,986 posts)Hell no, I wouldnt do it. But neither would I pretend I would.
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,586 posts)After all, what are the chances that a nut with an AR-15 would show up at his school before he retired?
The idea that any one person -- police officer, teacher, principal, or concealed carry passerby -- with a handgun can successfully bring down someone with an assault weapon is pure fantasy, a simplistic solution to a complex problem believed only by small minded politicians and some NRA members.
And Donnie Two Scoops, of course.
lapfog_1
(29,205 posts)Would any of us, armed with a handgun, go into a close quarters shooting situation against a person intent on killing anyone and everyone, armed with an assault rifle and, possibly, wearing body armor.
It would be something like this...
https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2017/02/28/north-hollywood-shootout-anniversary-orig.cnn
Only indoors with just you versus the shooter
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)The Tacoma Mall shooting.
In all cases, after the shooter was engaged by a bystander with a gun, or a police officer with a gun, no one else died.
If the shooter has to deal with armed opposition, it costs him time. Time that gets SWAT closer. Time that gets regular cops with rifles closer. Time for victims to GTFO, hide, barricade, etc. Some of the shooters suicide upon encountering resistance.
Every SECOND is the difference between one more victim, or not.
lapfog_1
(29,205 posts)tell that to the kids at Columbine.
The school SRO engaged Eric Harris when Harris went to reload. He shot at him and thought he hit him but then Eric started firing back again and went back into the school.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/21/columbine-armed-guards_n_2347096.html
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)I should have been more specific. Columbine is certainly an exception. They did commit suicide, but not immediately upon encountering the SRO. They escaped him, and kept shooting for a time, inside the school.
Nailzberg
(4,610 posts)Nowadays, police are trained to directly engage active shooters. They drill on it. And it saves lives. There have sadly had many active shooter cases to examine, and across law enforcement, direct engagement has become the rule. It would appear this SRO did not do his job.
Nailzberg
(4,610 posts)The arms race between cops and civilians is goddamn insanity.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)Mosby
(16,318 posts)I know I would. He had the element of surprise, even though he was probably out gunned.
The problem is cops are trained to avoid threats, they are good at setting up perimeters and that's about it.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)There's a good chance the cop followed the training.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)not sound like they were standing by him because he folllowed training or commending his actions if they were suspending him without pay imo
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)PdxSean
(574 posts)Yes, I think the average person, with or without police training, WOULD have gone into the building armed with a handgun if it meant potentially saving the lives of a bunch of high school kids.
The fact that this person was sworn to protect them, let them rely on him to protect them, then failed or refused to take even minimum steps to protect them, makes the tragedy that much worse.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)I don't know what I would have done.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)But then I receive professional training and got paid to do that sort of thing you know, shoot people and do your best not to be shot while doing it. This poor sap went to the firing range every 6 months to prove that he could still hit the broadside of the barn. He did the only thing a man of his age, with his training, with the tools at hand could have done and that stay alive.
BoneyardDem
(1,202 posts)these guys hired on for that (albeit hoping its never necessary). Apparently even those trained for such occasions, will hesitate. Teachers are not cut of the same cloth as combatants. And that is as it should be. We all pick professions which suit our temperament.
tblue37
(65,403 posts)BoneyardDem
(1,202 posts)just on one BB there are several of us with that same thought.
PdxSean
(574 posts)BoneyardDem
(1,202 posts)It's what the school hires. They know these are not brave, military Rambo types when they interview them.
PdxSean
(574 posts)I suspect his union will agree with you, though, and argue that the poor guy was just another frightened, untrained officer of the law.
BoneyardDem
(1,202 posts)I work with a local PD on numerous projects.....most officers here (and I suspect the crime demographics here are similar to the area of this school) will go their whole careers and never have to take their weapon out of their holster in any situation outside of target practice. I'm pretty sure they are trained to take cover, not take risks and wait for back up under these types of situations, especially if out manned, or out gunned. It's the reality.
Cha
(297,293 posts)SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)world wide wally
(21,744 posts)In all reality, it would have just been one more casualty in spite of what Trump or LaPierre says. But, on the other hand, he knew that when he took the job. Sucks to be a security guard.
Greybnk48
(10,168 posts)like that. It would have been suicide!
TheMastersNemesis
(10,602 posts)Greybnk48
(10,168 posts)that they have an assault rifle, a.k.a. "school shooter."
JenniferJuniper
(4,512 posts)of those who scream that teachers with handguns are the answer.
One person with a "normal" weapon would have not had a chance and the odds of him actually saving anyone in this situation were pretty much nil.
Greybnk48
(10,168 posts)I hate it that this man or woman is being pilloried about this.
RandySF
(58,899 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)been a good idea. If he'd gone like that, he might have shot some students himself. I suspect if he knew a bunch of students were going to die, he might have chosen the guns blazing.
Again, I don't know the facts. I understand the police hung back too trying to assess the situation. Supposedly it was all over in 7 minutes or so. That's not a lot of time to assess a situation.
I think some folks in the Las Vegas shooting hung back too. I bet a lot of folks who daydream they'd run in and end the thing with one perfect shot, have second thoughts when they find themselves in a real situation.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)A regular handgun versus an assault rifle. Some think that is a fair fight, I don't
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)it or not.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)Not paid enough to commit suicide considering the fact they were seriously outgunned.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)He was not willing to do his job. He's a coward. I've taken armed jobs and I have a family full of law enforcement officers. When you take a job, you do the job. If you are scared, you should get another job, not just hope you never have to act.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)They didnt sign up to face a weapon of war with a pop gun. Also, police are trained to not go into a situation like this like "John Wayne". They are trained to wait for backup.
Yonnie3
(17,444 posts)The training I read of was to essentially wait for the SWAT team. Establish a perimeter, gather information and so forth. I read that this training was being re-thought and other protocols were being developed to more rapidly engage. Part of the changes were to arm and train more officers with more powerful weapons. The discussion of the new protocol made it clear to me that as soon as the needed number of LEO were present (SWAT or not) to go in and engage. Not for a single officer, to do so.
Even if this new protocol which was being developed in a large city was rolled out. When would it have gotten to Parkland. Would it have peculated down to a nearly retired SRO? I doubt it.
obamanut2012
(26,080 posts)Cops do not sign up for a suicide mission, they are nit military. They know they may be killed, but you are wrong, they do not sign up for a firefight. Esp an SRO. In PARKLAND.
I loathe many, maybe most cops, but this dude was not a coward. He didn't want to die, armed only with a 9 mm and a couple mags.
rpannier
(24,329 posts)I think that means he has specialized training
He was close enough to retirement that he was probably making decent money. And even if he wasn't, as a deputy sheriff he has responsibilities that he did not meet
obamanut2012
(26,080 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)train to keep themselves alive too.
obamanut2012
(26,080 posts)Baconator
(1,459 posts)Training is supposed to improve your odds but I've seen both...
cilla4progress
(24,736 posts)keep our students safe from all the automatic weapons out there.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)Guns are involved in every shooting. This to prevent one, you must remove the other.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)To defend what is political insanity.
Motley13
(3,867 posts)obamanut2012
(26,080 posts)As per local media.
mnhtnbb
(31,392 posts)to determine whether it's better to wait for back up or go in alone. Many of the first to arrive on scene
wait for back up so they can coordinate entering a building that can have many exits and they may not
know where the shooter is located.
OregonBlue
(7,754 posts)It might have at least made the shooter pause and think about whether he wanted to go on or whether he might need to look for cover for himself. To not have even fired to try to let the guy know there were other people on the campus with guns was not smart. He will regret it for the rest of his life.
jmowreader
(50,559 posts)1) SRO opens the door and screams "I'm going to come in and shoot you!"
2) Gunman puts in a fresh magazine and aims his rifle at the door.
3) When enough of the SRO gets through the door, gunman starts firing until the SRO is dead on the floor.
If you don't have enough people to enter en masse, it's better to stay outside and make sure no one else goes in. If he would have entered the building by himself, he'd be dead too.
obamanut2012
(26,080 posts)OregonBlue
(7,754 posts)inside. It might be enough to make the person with the weapon panic or at least stop what he was doing and seek some sort of cover. Obviously if he has a handgun and the guy has a kid killer 15 he should not attempt to actually take the shooter on.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)Thrill
(19,178 posts).
Delmette2.0
(4,166 posts)But women are not deemed capable of making their own reproductive decisions from birth control (Holly Lobby) to abortion. We are uninformed, hormonal or hysterical. Yet, women are expected to control a room full of scared children or teenagers and defend them with a gun, possibly against a person they know as a former student or their neighbors child.
Proud liberal 80
(4,167 posts)There wasnt an unarmed black man to kill.
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)Who can really blame the police officer armed with a pistol not going in against a shooter armed with an AR-15.
Fast forward to the teacher then let it sink in - around 80% of public school teachers are women. Is that who you really expect to take on an AR-15? That is just plain nuts.
7962
(11,841 posts)I know several women who can outshoot most any man, because they've been well trained.
We have thousands of well trained women in the military.
One of the 2 officers who stopped the Congress ball team shooting was a woman. And she was also up against an AR I believe.
if it was a test of strength it may be a different story.
But if this came to pass, no teacher should be armed unless they WANT to be.
I'd rather see regular security. Obviously this guy screwed up. he's not typical
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)Is because it would upset the apple cart. Women would get out of teaching in droves. Yes, women have held up their end in combat - it is just not a profession they aspire to in large numbers as they prefer family friendly jobs like teaching.
7962
(11,841 posts)That would be totally ridiculous & dangerous.
Which, I guess, means trump will recommend it tomorrow
I still think the better compromise would be armed security that were NOT teachers. That way they could focus on the school grounds all the time.
obamanut2012
(26,080 posts)Sorry, I don't believe that. They sign up knowing they MAY be killed, but not that they have to go on a suicide mission. They are not military, although some them think they are.
This was PARKLAND. This was an older guy armed with a 9mm. A SRO. This wasn't a SWAT guy or even an active a patrol cop. And, again, I'm from here, and this was PARKLAND.
He should be fired for this, but I cannot call him a coward, I just can't.
HopeAgain
(4,407 posts)The gym teacher who did put his life on the line never signed up for that.
Devil Child
(2,728 posts)If it was an unarmed black man I'm sure he would've charged in blazing away.
We are supposed to depend on the PD? They either kill us themselves or run away hiding when we are getting killed.
PubliusEnigma
(1,583 posts)All we need is some more of those.
Calculating
(2,955 posts)When you take a job that requires you to carry a gun, you're taking on a certain responsibility. Namely that you might be called upon to use that gun some day in order to do your job. His job was to engage the active shooter and try to save some lives. If he wasn't ok with the possibility of some day needing to engage a school shooter then he should've got a job as a mall cop or something.
Oneironaut
(5,504 posts)It's easy to say what someone else "should have done," not being in that situation. It wasn't your life on the line - there's no personal investment.
It's different when it's you and when it's actually happening. The truth is, given the same situation, nobody knows how they would actually act.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)He was a coward. I've performed personal and executive protection and I know how I've reacted.
Oneironaut
(5,504 posts)Everyone would like to know how theyre going to react in a challenging situation, but the truth is, nobody does 100%. Its not cowardice vs. bravery - its the human condition. Its why the military tries to train the unpredictable fight-or-flight response out of their soldiers so that its much more likely theyll stay and fight.
Devil Child
(2,728 posts)He signed up for this by virtue of wearing the badge.
Cops are supposed to head TOWARDS danger not AWAY from it.
Oneironaut
(5,504 posts)but his failure is understandable.