General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy is Billy Graham being given the honor of lying in the Capitol Rotunda?
Oh, that's right , we've become a full blown theocracy. This is a disgrace and the founders are turning over in their graves.
Evangelist Billy Graham, who died Wednesday, will lie in the U.S. Capitol Rotunda from Wednesday, Feb. 28, to Thursday, March 1, according to an announcement from House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky). Members of the public are invited to pay their respects. Ryan and McConnell will take part in a service upon the arrival of Grahams casket.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2018/02/22/billy-graham-funeral-details-u-s-capitol-viewing-private-service-in-charlotte/?hpid=hp_hp-more-top-stories-2_billy-graham-1215pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.2e8ea57c63c2
spanone
(135,844 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Mariana
(14,858 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Raster
(20,998 posts)Shrek
(3,981 posts)And yet the republic stands.
Recognizing religious figures doesn't mean we're a theocracy.
Mariana
(14,858 posts)Edited for clarity.
msongs
(67,413 posts)DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)Sneederbunk
(14,291 posts)Not just a GOP thing.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)He has no place there.
gopiscrap
(23,761 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,862 posts)bible-thumping bully. I have never understood why otherwise sensible Presidents ever said nice things about him. Not that they needed to say anything bad, but they supported and encouraged his behavior to those who didn't believe the same crap he believed.
magicarpet
(14,155 posts).... given the courtesy to lie in state in the capital rotunda too ?
Solly Mack
(90,771 posts)That shouldn't be.
Sick country.
nocalflea
(1,387 posts)Not my thing, but I recognize he has the respect of folks from both parties.
Now, if it were Pat Robertson given that honor , I'd be pissed.
I get the hyperbole but until religious laws are passed and the constitution amended we're not a theocracy.
Orange Free State
(611 posts)should also have that honor.
nocalflea
(1,387 posts)gopiscrap
(23,761 posts)also MLK was honored not because of being a religious figure, but for being a civil rights icon
nocalflea
(1,387 posts)It is Congress' right to bestow this honor on whom they see fit.
Yes, I too wish they would leave religion out of it.
Graham is being honored for the role he played in the life of the nation. It just happens that role was religious in nature.
Subtle distinction, but a distinction none the less.
Take solace . Dr. King has a place in US history. No one will remember Graham.
Proud liberal 80
(4,167 posts)Wonder if invitation went out to President Obama seeing that Franklin us probably controlling everything.
politicaljunkie41910
(3,335 posts)loyalsister
(13,390 posts)and hundreds of law makers. He is said to have had a unique awareness of what their responsibilities meant. From what I understand, he was a kind person with some disgusting ideas. The same can be said about some of our favorite presidents.
I see his death as no great loss, but apparently he did have a unique relationship with US government officials. I don't love the idea, but I also don't have a huge problem with it.
eleny
(46,166 posts)I'm sorry to see Dems lining up for this.
I recall seeing Graham at his extravaganzas on tv when I was a kid many decades ago.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)she was an atheist (actually something called a theosophist). I never quite got the jist of that whole philosophy.
She hated Graham's sermon's, talking about getting "saved" in almost angry terms. She hated all that yelling, considered it rude.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)But if J Edgar Hoover didn't cause a lightning strike on the rotunda, we're probably safe with Graham.
librechik
(30,674 posts)Initech
(100,080 posts)I hate these fucking assholes.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)co-sponsored by 9 Republicans and 3 Democrats to allow that to happen.
See:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/107/all-info
pangaia
(24,324 posts)SomethingNew
(279 posts)The founders were not, and constitution, to the dismay of many, is not anti-religion. I think you'd be pretty hard pressed to find another non-politician that has had as large an impact on the US government (an impact that a great many democrats, including presidents, saw as beneficial).