General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy don't we have state run psychiatric hospitals anymore to lock these potential shooters up in?
This latest shooter had so many warning signs and people seeing them that he easily should have been committed for some length of time but the States don't have the resources or facilities anymore to secure and evaluate these individuals.
Then that takes care of being able to legally buy a firearm, one of the questions asks if you have ever been involuntarily committed for mental health reasons, now they can't buy firearms if they are ever released.
Decades ago these crazy bastards would have been committed and medicated. Now they are just allowed to roam free and put all the rest of us in danger.
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)I have a nephew who scares the hell out of all of us. We have tried in vain to get him into inpatient care to no avail. The state won't take his guns either. Thankfully I think he is more of a danger to himself than others, but who the hell knows. We have done our best. He doesn't think he has an issue. I have blocked him on every single platform, FB, pintrest, linked in, and text messaging due to his angry nasty posts. Does he need serious help, yes, can we get it for him, no.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,370 posts)redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)Given that this youth was voluntarily seeking counseling and didn't meet the definition/criteria of an immediate danger, he wouldn't have fallen under the act. It's written for people that attempted suicide or have schizophrenia or similar.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,370 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)A generally morose person who makes potentially hyperbolic statements is probably nearly impossible. It takes more evidence than this kid provided in person. We are all looking at it with 20/20 hindsight.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)And why "some length of time"?
madville
(7,412 posts)They should be evaluated and treated until they can be trusted to be in society on their own.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Not enough to even formulate an opinion.
Voltaire2
(13,061 posts)This wasnt a mental health management issue, nor was the problem that weve shutdown many of the state mental health institutions, almost all of which were appalling nightmares when they were operational,
THE PROBLEM IS GUNS.
Everything else is an irrelevant distraction.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,735 posts)Many mental institutions were closed down during the Reagan administration, but not to improve the treatment of the mentally ill. Regan established block grants for the states to care for the mentally ill instead of hospitalizing them, but mostly people were turned loose with little support or access to treatment, which led to an increase in the homeless population. What should have happened is providing more money to improve institutions and housing for the mentally ill.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)And there are some of these folks still living in Homeless Camps all over the Nation.
Out of sight,out of mind attitudes.
GP6971
(31,168 posts)Cattledog
(5,916 posts)loyalsister
(13,390 posts)It was not Reagan. People were being treated brutally, their health and well being was ignored. The conditions were inhumane and it was happening across the country.
If people were placed in institutions and treated the way the general public talks about them, we would have a resurgence of those conditions.
TwistOneUp
(1,020 posts)Because President Ronald Rayguns, having bought into the Lafferty "Trickle Down" curve bs, decided to balance the budget by terminating public funding of psychiatric institutions (among other things). And the rethuglicans, now seeing Rayguns as prescient and an icon, have now instituted a tax cut based on the trickle down theory. So history does repeat itself...
This is why there are so many homeless peeps with psychiatric issues.
The only thing that trickles down, imo, is the 1% peeing on the rest of us. No wonder Cheetolini likes it so much!
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)The idea was to replace them with group homes. It wasn't Reagan's idea, but he knew a way to cut services when he saw one. We closed the hospitals but never built enough group homes, due to cost and NIMBY.
MattP
(3,304 posts)Had a relative the Dr said they needed to keep him another week at least got a phone call from insurance while we were talking to him and he said good news he's going home today
vlyons
(10,252 posts)Back when he was Calif gov, he just turned them out on the street, as a means to cut taxes. GOP across the nation followed suit.
mnhtnbb
(31,392 posts)(which also was sold as a civil rights issue) when he was Governor to transfer treatment of many patients who had been hospitalized to community
clinics where they would be treated on an outpatient basis. Problem was, no budget was allocated for the treatment.
And in our world of employment based health insurance which usually had lousy coverage for mental health care, very
few people who had been hospitalized were able to find treatment.
It was Ronald Reagan.
ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)Plus we do not take care of our people with even fairly benign mental illnesses.
Potential Murderers with guns are able to lose themselves in sub-cultures of guns. Lots of these people are a bit strange, so they arent going to recognize someone dangerous, is one thing I think.
RKP5637
(67,111 posts)If it costs money in the US it's often neglected, as were many of the hospitals. Then some of the staff including drs. were often strange and some were demented. It's a serious issue in this country that brags about itself to other nations. Now they are thrown in jails or wander the streets. When you dig into America, some of it's damn ugly.
hlthe2b
(102,293 posts)all under the guise of moving them to "community mental health centers" and restoring their civil rights/dignity. The latter were laudable goals, of course, and sold those on the Left but of course the RW just wanted the $$ for tax breaks.
Of course he never funded the community mental health centers so this just meant the mentally ill were farmed out to the streets, jails, homeless shelters, frequently without care or any supervision of meds.
Of course there were some horrific mental hospitals here (think Willowbrook) and abroad, but we surely did not end up with a workable, compassionate solution.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)The difference between now and decades ago is AR-15s.
madville
(7,412 posts)But we have seen that past legislation is ineffective in banning specific models of firearms because the manufacturers just design something different. There are many other models of firearms with the same capabilities.
Virginia Tech was just two handguns and killed almost double the number of people. Cho had also been ordered by the courts to seek outpatient mental health treatment prior to the incident among many other warning signs that no one really had the power to report or enforce.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,357 posts)madville
(7,412 posts)"professional school shooter" under his real name and it being reported to the FBI could have been a good starting point.
Turbineguy
(37,343 posts)10% of the population is clinically depressed, 1% is bi-polar and 1% is schizophrenic.
That's about 40,000,000 people to lock up.
Most of us feel lucky to not be one of "these crazy bastards", or a least should.
WhiteTara
(29,718 posts)marylandblue
(12,344 posts)Police had come to his home 30 times due to threats or violence against his mother. I don't think he should have been locked up, but people who commit domestic violence should not be allowed guns.