General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOn the Internet, nobody knows you're a Russian.
Published July 1993 in the New Yorker, and nothing has changed in the US.
In China it is illegal to post using other than your real name.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)that up until recently almost all communication in human history was face to face. Sure, people could give false names, spread lies through intermediaries, and some send written messages, but almost always we "owned" everything we said and its consequences.
Heard that an American Olympic skier who performed poorly received a blizzard of hate messages.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)But not entirely. I recall flame-fests on corporate email systems where everyone knew each other.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)We wouldn't lose our character flaws when we lost anonymity, or even lose all the fun.
Not that I'm advocating, just discussing. Everything has its tradeoffs of costs and benefits.
Ezior
(505 posts)The advantages are clear.
However, anonymous forum posts helped me a lot in my life. I've posted on gay teen forums and social anxiety forums.
So I'm torn. And to be honest, I don't want my real name to show up next to my posts on DU and similar forums. I'm not ashamed of my political opinions, but I don't want every random person to be able to read about them, then find out where I live and beat me up when I leave my home.
unblock
(52,392 posts)If they were willing hack computers, steal emails, and tamper with voter registrations and surely votes themselves, then Im sure they would have no problem breaking a law about false online identities.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)China doubles down on real-name registration laws, forbidding anonymous online posts
Chinas crackdown on Internet freedom is getting even more intense. Last Friday, the countrys top Internet censor announced a new set of regulations (link via Google Translate) meant to eliminate posts by anonymous users on Internet forums and other platforms. The Cyberspace Administration of China will start enforcing those rules on Oct. 1.
According to the new regulations, Internet companies and service providers are responsible for requesting and verifying real names from users when they register and must immediately report illegal content to the authorities. Tech firms, including Baidu, Alibaba and Tencent, are under more pressure to serve as the governments gatekeepers as China prepares for the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party this fall, which is expected to place new people in several key leadership positions.
Furthermore, a new cybersecurity law that went into effect at the beginning of June requires tech companies to store important data on servers within China. While this is supposedly meant to protect sensitive information, it can also make it easier for the government to track and persecute Internet users.
https://techcrunch.com/2017/08/27/china-doubles-down-on-real-name-registration-laws-forbidding-anonymous-online-posts/
Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,755 posts)a village in a combat zone.
tblue37
(65,502 posts)I think the lack of anonymity would tend to drive women off the internet, since they can be and sometimes are attacked IRL once trolls start attacking them online.
nolabels
(13,133 posts)They think they are still in a closed system. The internet is a vast trove of information that is getting more indispensable every day. Wayward governments around the world will always be nervous when information is getting out that they cannot control
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Information flows are limited by how fast people type, read, watch video, and listen to audio. And most of what they watch and listen to is highly redundant, consisting of copies held on web sites.
So I think that with the steadily increasing computational power it will be possible for governments to pretty thoroughly analyse communications. There are a whole array of countermeasures for things that the governments do not like.
The notions of early internet advocates that the internet will necessarily lead to a new age of great freedom are incorrect.
nolabels
(13,133 posts)As far as I can see it, people with internet access are only limited in the beliefs that they carry with them and of course, the things that are illegal and or things that would bring harm to them or others. It's hard for us to see this when we are sitting directly on top of it.
We are like in a big pool water while on the internet, an idea that works makes a ripple across it, and a really good idea makes many ripples.
Twenty years ago many would not believe the internet would be putting printed media out of business or solar power would be challenging fossil fuels. Mostly its because we have the freedom of internet that we can share ideas from. There are so many things that would not be possible without it now. There is no real need to be an outright subversive because when those big ripples come then those ideas behind them change things thus making it a mostly unneeded mode.
Sure, governments can make you think they have everything under control but in reality, they are all just along for the ride like the rest of us
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Because we are not propagating ripples of original thought, but just propagating what we are being fed in affinity groups.
poboy2
(2,078 posts)People believe what they want to believe.