General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFederal judge has blocked President Trump's unlawful order ending DACA -grants nationwide injunction
*BREAKING* A federal judge has blocked President @realDonaldTrump's unlawful order ending the #DACA program and granted our request for a nationwide injunction.Link to tweet
Link to tweet
UPDATE TO ADD:
National Immigration Law Center
✔
@NILC_org
BREAKING: Victory for our plaintiffs! A federal court has issued a second order to #ProtectDreamers nationwide. Two federal courts have now determined that @realDonaldTrump's termination of DACA was unlawful.
Link to tweet
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)the POS...wait for it...3-2-1...
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)I wonder if this will put a kink in the ICE raids, and if we'll stop locking up people who haven't committed a criminal offense?
pandr32
(11,601 posts)That would be wonderful and hopefully would end the push to elevate ICE to a sort of IA. That is some scary sh*t!
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)alas tho, rush to the USA Supreme Court happening probably now, per our racist DOJ leader head case, Sessions.
Weed Man
(304 posts)and Trump ordered for mental evaluation by fifty independent neurologists who'll come up with the same results: TRUMP IS FUCKING NUTS!
procon
(15,805 posts)Link to tweet
Eric Schneiderman
?
#BREAKING: Our coalition of 17 AGs just won a preliminary injunction blocking @POTUSs discriminatory attempt to end #DACA and deport DREAMers.
babylonsister
(171,079 posts)world wide wally
(21,751 posts)barbtries
(28,810 posts)stephen miller must be losing his hair.
BigmanPigman
(51,623 posts)Earlier today the moron said that the Dems didn't really want to negotiate a serious immigration deal then he later said that he was only kidding. Ha, ha.
Fla Dem
(23,723 posts)Not a final judgement? What happens now?
Igel
(35,337 posts)It's not saying DACA is the law. It's saying that the process he used to rescind the memo didn't follow the required publicize proposal, review it, take comments, etc. APA stuff.
It's also not saying that DACA is legal. And previously it was pointed out that it doesn't matter if the promulgation of the DACA memo also failed to follow the APA requirements--they sort of did that after the ball was rolling, but once established however irregularly it must be dealt with as a fact on the ground.
MichMan
(11,958 posts)Even though DACA was never passed into law in the first place, if it can't be rescinded, doesn't that essentially make it a law?
tritsofme
(17,394 posts)My understanding is that a best case scenario outcome would be that Trump is required to follow the APA and have a notice and comment period before withdrawing DACA. Even this outcome is questionable, Obama's position was that DACA or DAPA did not fall under the APA, but some court ruling suggested he may have been forced to comply.
So while the turnabout is rather ironic, whether Trump can be forced to comply with the APA in withdrawing an order that was not issued under it is question well above my pay scale.
williesgirl
(4,033 posts)Sophia4
(3,515 posts)courts.
Without federal courts, no immigration laws could be enforced. That would mean that if an immigrant, let's say for example, an immigrant who entered our country legally, committed a crime, the immigration court would not be there to deport him or her. That person might end up in a state prison rather than be sent out of the country.
So defunding or cutting the funding for federal courts would not help Trump.
Congress needs to enact a DACA law, an immigration law.
It is very difficult to live in a country if you don't know the language of that country well. The DACA applicants are American in terms of language and culture. It would be difficult for them to go to the countries in which they were born.
I knew my great-grandfather when he was very old. He went as a 12-year-old with his father to fight in the Civil War for the Union. He came to this country as a child. No one knew that until he died and we found his Taufschein, which is German for his German baptismal certificate. He was not born in this country. He was brought in by his parents. Today we would consider him an "illegal" because he apparently did not go through immigration procedures.
Our immigration procedures were not always as clear as they are today. Many of US would not be here if our ancestors had been so rigorously categorized and questioned before they entered the US.
I side with the DACA immigrants as long as they do not commit the crimes for which immigrants are deported.
lindysalsagal
(20,718 posts)Wooo hooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SunSeeker
(51,646 posts)True patriots.
Cha
(297,503 posts)bluestarone
(17,012 posts)so can some that were deported recently COME BACK???? I'm hoping so
Cha
(297,503 posts)bdamomma
(63,917 posts)trumps ass to the wall or is it Stephen Miller???
renate
(13,776 posts)I don't see it on cnn.com or msnbc.com... am I missing something?
OnyxSharpie
(33 posts)Its so hard to tell these days.
SWBTATTReg
(22,156 posts)tRUMP seems to think he has unlimited power. He doesn't. Period.
Now to legislate a durable and lasting solution to this situation, and quit using these kids and their families as hostages.
dchill
(38,516 posts)Ayn Rand Society weenie roast! It's un-Murican!
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,590 posts)Elwood P Dowd
(11,443 posts)for sperm tracks.
Stardust1
(123 posts)I hope this saved some dreamers, at least for now.
librechik
(30,676 posts)40RatRod
(532 posts)I would think it would be headlines.