Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
he didn't notice anything suspicious when he sold 720 rounds of ammunition (Original Post) Ptah Feb 2018 OP
Which shooting does this refer to? guillaumeb Feb 2018 #1
Las Vegas nt Phoenix61 Feb 2018 #3
Thank you. guillaumeb Feb 2018 #5
Doesn't matter. Ptah Feb 2018 #4
True. guillaumeb Feb 2018 #6
+1 uponit7771 Feb 2018 #9
Armor piercing ammo at that nt Phoenix61 Feb 2018 #2
Literally ANY common deer rifle round will penetrate armor. Tough sell. linuxman Feb 2018 #13
Read the indictment for tourself Nevernose Feb 2018 #45
Which he was manufacturing illegally and had his fingerprints on them. herding cats Feb 2018 #18
I just Googled "bulk ammo" and it's offered in batches of 500 "cheap." Eugene Feb 2018 #7
Thats a stretch James48 Feb 2018 #8
Yada yada yada. Bang! Bang! Ptah Feb 2018 #11
Any center fire rifle ammo... Adrahil Feb 2018 #17
Nobody hunts with hollow points Drahthaardogs Feb 2018 #19
I would introduce serious gun regulation and ban the bullet you refer to. Demsrule86 Feb 2018 #28
That didn't take long. Iggo Feb 2018 #40
He was also making cop killer ammo. Blue_true Feb 2018 #10
How was it cop-killer ammo? linuxman Feb 2018 #14
Armor piecing bullets can pass through some police protective vests. Blue_true Feb 2018 #21
Even regular rifle ammo can punch through a police vest. NutmegYankee Feb 2018 #23
True, but the issue is survivability. It is lower with armor piercing bullets. nt Blue_true Feb 2018 #24
It depends. NutmegYankee Feb 2018 #26
Armour piercing bullets are deadly no matter what sick of the gun apologists here. They should be Demsrule86 Feb 2018 #29
You are wrong of course. NutmegYankee Feb 2018 #31
I am not wrong. Demsrule86 Feb 2018 #43
Nothing you just said had anything to do with your being wrong. NutmegYankee Feb 2018 #46
Vests help bullets that break apart easily break apart while in the vest. Blue_true Feb 2018 #30
Armor piercing was designed for vehicles, and is clearly a military use. NutmegYankee Feb 2018 #32
Is that supported with evidence? sl8 Feb 2018 #38
But pretty much any deer rifle will penetrate a kevlar vest without breaking a sweat. linuxman Feb 2018 #33
There's a magazine called "Shotgun News" SonofDonald Feb 2018 #12
Every time I hear one of the Trump humpers ragging on the "liberal media"... Initech Feb 2018 #20
That's pretty silly, though. linuxman Feb 2018 #34
Just a very "routine transaction" according to his lawyer. joshcryer Feb 2018 #15
Can you point me out a single shred of US law exempting gun shows from following established laws? linuxman Feb 2018 #35
Then fix the definition of commercial seller. moriah Feb 2018 #39
Except it's not a loophole. linuxman Feb 2018 #41
Surprised you aren't familiar. moriah Feb 2018 #42
Ummm I buy ammo by the case, when I buy... Adrahil Feb 2018 #16
720 would be a small purchase. NutmegYankee Feb 2018 #22
Why would that be suspicious? EX500rider Feb 2018 #25
If you only care about your profit, like selling condos to russians, you wont care Eliot Rosewater Feb 2018 #27
Yep. Own a 10/22 and four boxes of ammo? Welcome to a watch list! linuxman Feb 2018 #37
gun humping piece of shit COWARD Skittles Feb 2018 #36
Why would he? Bradical79 Feb 2018 #44

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
5. Thank you.
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 10:45 PM
Feb 2018

There have been so many. But given that the NRA controls the debate, and the SCOTUS, this is a natural consequence of a country that fetishizes guns.

herding cats

(19,565 posts)
18. Which he was manufacturing illegally and had his fingerprints on them.
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 01:29 AM
Feb 2018

Nothing suspicious about that in the least.

James48

(4,436 posts)
8. Thats a stretch
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 10:49 PM
Feb 2018

Not really “armor piercing”- reloading with
Steel tips is a common practice. At one time the ATF was talking about considering them “armor piercing”, but as I recall, they backed off that position after a large pushback from gun owners and technical experts.

The steel tipped bullets used on the M855 round of 5.56 mm are actually very common, they don’t easily pierce armor, and are, in fact, far less leathal that hunting style hollow point bullets.

And these steel tipped M855 style rounds do not meet the strict legal definition of “armor piercing” that are regulated under the law.

See http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2015/03/foghorn/the-truth-about-m855-5-56-nato-ammunition/

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
17. Any center fire rifle ammo...
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 01:23 AM
Feb 2018

Will penetrate typical police soft armor. Even just plain Jane FMJ ball ammo.

Drahthaardogs

(6,843 posts)
19. Nobody hunts with hollow points
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 01:37 AM
Feb 2018

You want a bullet to mushroom but stay together and maintain energy for deep penetration.

Maybe varmits with hollow points but not even furbearers because you want the hide intact.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
10. He was also making cop killer ammo.
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 11:00 PM
Feb 2018

People like that know exactly what they are doing and are almost always anti-social.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
21. Armor piecing bullets can pass through some police protective vests.
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 02:33 PM
Feb 2018

Modern vest are better at stopping the bullets, but no one should have that type of bullet in regular society.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
26. It depends.
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 02:52 PM
Feb 2018

A hard core bullet might stay together longer in flesh whereas many lead rifle rounds break apart and send shrapnel throughout. In the end, it's all just luck on trajectory. A mere .22 short in an artery will kill.

It's best to not be shot at all.

Demsrule86

(68,586 posts)
29. Armour piercing bullets are deadly no matter what sick of the gun apologists here. They should be
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 02:57 PM
Feb 2018

banned.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
31. You are wrong of course.
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 03:03 PM
Feb 2018

Any bullet that misses a major organ or circulatory system vessel is likely to not be fatal. It doesn't matter what it is made of - it's all about what it hits in the body. It may cause serious life altering injury, but that's not considered "death".

And no, this is not a "gun apologist" answer, it's actually a medical answer.

Demsrule86

(68,586 posts)
43. I am not wrong.
Sun Feb 4, 2018, 04:24 PM
Feb 2018

Ordinary citizens should not have such weapons...and I fully expect at sometime an intelligent SCOTUS will find that a militia does not refer to an individual right to carry...I am sick sick of walking around with these asshats with guns strapped to their hip at the grocery store...big loser...at some point this will become a voting issue and the gun lobby will be done.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
46. Nothing you just said had anything to do with your being wrong.
Sun Feb 4, 2018, 09:09 PM
Feb 2018

In fact, we agree on basically all of this post. However, on the medical claim from the previous post, you are still wrong.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
30. Vests help bullets that break apart easily break apart while in the vest.
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 03:01 PM
Feb 2018

Armor piercing rounds are designed to clear armor mostly intact, then start other action like tearing into flesh or breaking apart once in the body. Society is better off without armor piecing bullets.

BTW, who TRIES to get shot? That is a new one.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
32. Armor piercing was designed for vehicles, and is clearly a military use.
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 03:16 PM
Feb 2018

While the military does have ceramic armor vests that can reduce it's damage, civilian police don't wear armor of that quality routinely. It wouldn't fit under their shirts and would be uncomfortable for daily work. The problem for them is the rifle round has such a significant velocity that it can penetrate the vest, even when just lead. Now one object doing damage is a problem, but a bullet that fragments just increases the risk of death. More chances to tear open an artery.

Should civilians have AP rounds - HELL NO. But it's not because they are "cop killers". It's because they have no valid civilian use whatsoever. No animal in the woods has armored glass or metal sides.


sl8

(13,788 posts)
38. Is that supported with evidence?
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 04:04 PM
Feb 2018

Last edited Sat Feb 3, 2018, 05:12 PM - Edit history (2)

I would have thought that projectiles designed to expand would be involved in more deaths than projectiles designed for penetrating armor, but that's only my guess.

Do you have numbers?

 

linuxman

(2,337 posts)
33. But pretty much any deer rifle will penetrate a kevlar vest without breaking a sweat.
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 03:48 PM
Feb 2018

Show me a basic, popular rifle round used every deer season, and I'll show you a round that will slice through kevlar like butter.

It's not a special property of a round that makes it AP, it's the velocity and size, which pretty much every common centerfire rifle developed in the last 150 years has enough of.

AP ammo generally refers to a round with a special penetrator with the brass jacket, usually made of tungsten or some similarly super-dense metal. AP in that regard refers to the ability to penetrate steel armor of the type seen on vehicles, such as humvees and armored cars.

SonofDonald

(2,050 posts)
12. There's a magazine called "Shotgun News"
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 12:13 AM
Feb 2018

Pick up a copy at your local major bookstore/news stand and take a look inside.

A real eye-opener, how much ammo do you want?.

Initech

(100,081 posts)
20. Every time I hear one of the Trump humpers ragging on the "liberal media"...
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 03:30 AM
Feb 2018

I always want to ask them "OK wise guy, if there really is a liberal media, how come on every supermarket magazine aisle, I could count 12 different gun magazines, yet we only get one Vanity Fair?". Guarantee that would shut them up pretty quickly!

 

linuxman

(2,337 posts)
34. That's pretty silly, though.
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 03:50 PM
Feb 2018

Nobody is suggesting there is a fashion-bias in media. I'm a 30 year old male and can name 10 fashion mags for sale in the racks off the top of my head. I dig guns, but I honestly don't know if I could do the same with gun mags.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
15. Just a very "routine transaction" according to his lawyer.
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 01:01 AM
Feb 2018

Close the gun show loophole. He met the guy at a gun show, gave his card, met him somewhere else, and gave him almost a thousand rounds of ammo.

How many of these "routine transactions" happen every day without anyone know about it or there being a paper trail until after the fact (when the feds go over the texts and do interviews).

 

linuxman

(2,337 posts)
35. Can you point me out a single shred of US law exempting gun shows from following established laws?
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 03:51 PM
Feb 2018

There is no gun show loophole.

moriah

(8,311 posts)
39. Then fix the definition of commercial seller.
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 04:13 PM
Feb 2018

It used to be a certain number of guns a year, now it's whether most of your money comes from gun sales.

The "gun show loophole" is more accurately identified as the "part time seller loophole".

 

linuxman

(2,337 posts)
41. Except it's not a loophole.
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 05:12 PM
Feb 2018

Selling guns habitually and in quantity without a license at a gunshow confers no protection vs. doing so in your livingroom or in a wal-mart parking lot.

The actual line between selling guns for personal reasons vs. commercial seems quite open to interpretation and the individual whims of law enforcement/ATF/prosecutors.

You can read more about it here. https://www.atf.gov/file/100871/download

As far as there used to having been a number of guns you could sell in a certain period, you'd have to show me where that was law, as I'm unfamiliar.

moriah

(8,311 posts)
42. Surprised you aren't familiar.
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 05:44 PM
Feb 2018

Before 1986 the ATF figured selling four guns per year per person was a good easy "bright line" to define private party sellers (so a couple could unload, no pun intended, eight firearms annually).

The 1986 legislation changed that to a far more flexible definition and the secondary gun market is essentially unregulated as a result.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
16. Ummm I buy ammo by the case, when I buy...
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 01:20 AM
Feb 2018

Cheaper that way, and doesn't go bad. That last case of ammo I bought was 1200 rounds. Lasts me about a year of range trips.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
22. 720 would be a small purchase.
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 02:38 PM
Feb 2018

Ammo is commonly sold in "bricks" of 500. It's like buying bulk packs of other products to get a better price.

EX500rider

(10,849 posts)
25. Why would that be suspicious?
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 02:46 PM
Feb 2018

Were you under the impression ammo was bought one round at a time?

Easy to go through a few hundred on a single trip to the range.

Eliot Rosewater

(31,112 posts)
27. If you only care about your profit, like selling condos to russians, you wont care
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 02:52 PM
Feb 2018

Regardless of whether or not this purchase is large for guns what we know is there are too many guns and ALL of them should be locked up in militias

Having guns and thousands of rounds of ammo is something that should be a signal of something is wrong but in this country it isnt

SAD

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»he didn't notice anything...