Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pbmus

(12,422 posts)
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 10:21 PM Feb 2018

The Nunes memo, annotated: 10 things that may not be as simple as they appear

The memo released by the House Intelligence Committee makes several claims that are in dispute. Here are key points in the debate.

Purpose

This memorandum provides Members an update on significant facts relating to the Committee's ongoing investigation into the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and their use of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) during the 2016 presidential election cycle. Our findings, which are detailed below, 1) raise concerns with the legitimacy and legality of certain DOJ and FBI interactions with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC), and 2) represent a troubling breakdown of legal processes established to protect the American people from abuses related to the FISA process.


David Lauter Washington Bureau Chief

Notably, this memo by the Intelligence Committee majority staff does not assert that the DoJ and FBI actions were illegitimate or illegal, just that they "raise concerns."

http://www.latimes.com/politics/washington/la-na-pol-republican-memo-annotated-20180202-htmlstory.html

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Nunes memo, annotated...