Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump, Russia, Election. Quid, Pro, Quo.
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a15924593/trump-russia-election-quid-pro-quo/<snip>
Heres a story that you will not find in Tuesday mornings editions of either the New York Times or The Washington Post because reasons, I guess. On Monday, when President* Trump was fitting the employees of the Department of Justice for their armbands, he also was supposed to sign a bill imposing new sanctions on Russia for its ratfcking of the 2016 presidential election. Congress voted these new sanctions almost unanimously last year.
You know whats coming, right? You dont even need Reuters to see where the quid exchanges a warm embrace with the quo.
Today, we have informed Congress that this legislation and its implementation are deterring Russian defense sales, State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert said in a statement. Since the enactment of the ... legislation, we estimate that foreign governments have abandoned planned or announced purchases of several billion dollars in Russian defense acquisitions. Seeking to press President Donald Trump to clamp down on Russia, the U.S. Congress voted nearly unanimously last year to pass a law setting sweeping new sanctions on Moscow. Trump, who wanted warmer ties with Moscow and had opposed the legislation as it worked its way through Congress, signed it reluctantly in August, just six months into his presidency.
<snip>
Members of the Congress went predictably agog. Susan Collins of Maine, easily recognized by the neon letters Fool Me, Please that are attached to her forehead, was particularly gobsmacked, as The Hill reports.
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) on Tuesday said its perplexing that the Trump administration opted to not implement additional sanctions on Russia for meddling in the 2016 election. "The one thing we know for sure already is the Russians did attempt to meddle in our election. And not only should there be a price to pay in terms of sanctions, but also we need to put safeguards in place right now for the elections for this year, Collins said on CNNs New Day.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 722 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump, Russia, Election. Quid, Pro, Quo. (Original Post)
kentuck
Jan 2018
OP
Gothmog
(145,303 posts)1. From Prof. Tribe
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)2. Thank you, Kentuck
Unfortunately the czar is only going to pretend to give any quid pro quo. To fool the silly, uneducated Americans is just so easy. Which begs a tune for those who worship any strong man.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="
kentuck
(111,102 posts)3. It took a while for Russia to get their sanctions lifted since General Flynn promised them...
And now Donald says that sanctions are no longer needed???
It is the quid pro quo.
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)5. Yes, sad but true
gibraltar72
(7,506 posts)4. I for one am shocked I tell you shocked!