Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDemocrats need to start calling this whole thing RUSSIA-GATE when on TV.
Americans have been trained to ignore a scandal until you Gate it.
TV calls it Trump/Russia, Trump and the Russians and many other names
We need to BRAND scandal this in an easy way for mass TV consumption.
Thoughts?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 1084 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democrats need to start calling this whole thing RUSSIA-GATE when on TV. (Original Post)
TeamPooka
Jan 2018
OP
Takket
(21,578 posts)1. i think gate needs to be retired
watergate is eclipsed by the new standard "Trump Tower" in honor of the russia collusion meeting there.
"Watergate" should now be called "Water tower"
every scandal should end in "tower"
worstexever
(265 posts)10. I agree with retiring the term "gate" appended to every scandal
I've been calling it Russi-A-Lago for some time now.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)2. I'm quite happy equating tRump with Russia
That sends a clear message.
Skittles
(153,169 posts)3. TREASON-GATE
PoiBoy
(1,542 posts)5. +1,000,000... n/t
TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)6. too vague, assumes a conclusion, and would keep people from saying "What's that all about anyway?"
I'm talking about branding to get the word out. Not editorializing.
ghostsinthemachine
(3,569 posts)4. I agree...
Everyone needs to start using it.
Justice
(7,188 posts)7. Needs to have Trump in name.
TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)9. Watergate didn't need Nixon's name in it and that worked out just fine
DemocracyMouse
(2,275 posts)8. Yes! "Russia-gate" is solid, effective. So is "The Russia Scandal"