Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tblue37

(65,487 posts)
Tue Jan 16, 2018, 08:35 PM Jan 2018

I finally read "Cat Person." If you haven't, you should. It quite good about

the myriad ways in which a date & sexual encounter can go wrong because of disparate hopes & expectations, compounded by self delusion, romantic fantasies, and misreading of signals.

Besides, "everyone" is using it now as a baseline for discussion, so it's a good idea to be aware of the reference, I think.

Here's a link:

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/12/11/cat-person?reload=true

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I finally read "Cat Person." If you haven't, you should. It quite good about (Original Post) tblue37 Jan 2018 OP
Do note that it is under a "fiction" label but the author says it was... PoliticAverse Jan 2018 #1
The date/sex details, though, are based on "decades'" worth od experiences, not just one. nt tblue37 Jan 2018 #2
so glad she wrote that KT2000 Jan 2018 #3
She really hit it on the nail womanofthehills Jan 2018 #8
Thank you for posting this... fairfaxvadem Jan 2018 #4
The better litmus test isn't what happens on those solitary "dates" misanthrope Jan 2018 #6
I completely agree... fairfaxvadem Jan 2018 #7
I found it dismal and utterly depressing misanthrope Jan 2018 #5

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
1. Do note that it is under a "fiction" label but the author says it was...
Tue Jan 16, 2018, 08:44 PM
Jan 2018

Last edited Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:59 AM - Edit history (1)

"inspired by a nasty encounter online".

New Yorker magazine interview with the author:
https://www.newyorker.com/books/this-week-in-fiction/fiction-this-week-kristen-roupenian-2017-12-11

New York Times interview with the author:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/11/books/cat-person-new-yorker.html

KT2000

(20,587 posts)
3. so glad she wrote that
Tue Jan 16, 2018, 08:50 PM
Jan 2018

The reality of it struck me. The goldmine to me though was the ending - how honest was that fallback position! Frightening but that kind of thinking is still out there. Glad I am not young anymore.

fairfaxvadem

(1,231 posts)
4. Thank you for posting this...
Tue Jan 16, 2018, 09:08 PM
Jan 2018

As I read it, I recognized the story personally. Happened a few times when I was in my 20s. I’d agree to date someone who was outside my “comfort” zone, usually an older man. And it was never as I imagined. I missed my friends in my own age group who were my real social life, warts and all. Many of whom I’d known since grade school, others not. But I’d convinced myself I needed to broaden my dating horizons. After a few of these dates, I stopped and reconsidered who I was comfortable with and why.

For me, this story is simply about getting to know yourself when making these choices. And for me, these experiences at least told me what I didn’t want. None of them were bad men. All treated me very well. And sure, they had their own expectations of me. And that’s okay. But on reflection, I went on these dates pretty ignorant. Not their fault.

What I learned? “Dating” isn’t something you have to do after a certain point in your life (if ever, but don’t tell that to a 20-something). If I meet someone I really feel comfortable with, fine. See how it goes. If that little voice comes back or I try to convince myself because I haven’t had a date in a while, forget it.

Of course, you never know when you take a chance, we’ve all seen great outcomes. But the expectations game is a real one and it does take some experience to manage it. I couldn’t at 20-something.

misanthrope

(7,428 posts)
6. The better litmus test isn't what happens on those solitary "dates"
Tue Jan 16, 2018, 10:02 PM
Jan 2018

The way to know whether to pursue a relationship with someone or not is for both of you to spend time with each other's friends. Have them join you and your pals for get togethers and vice versa. You can unpack a lot more about each other that way.

fairfaxvadem

(1,231 posts)
7. I completely agree...
Tue Jan 16, 2018, 10:15 PM
Jan 2018

Which was my inarticulate point about missing my friends when choosing to go out on these dates. It was clear to me that these men would really never fit in my world, but it took me a few times to understand that and what was important to me. Just part of growing up and getting to know yourself better.

Now, I have a few friends who did end up with someone who would never fit in with “the gang,” not that that should be the determining factor. But these few friends did have to make a lot of effort to avoid social situations when they made that choice. In the long run, it really hasn’t mattered. The rest of us just learned to manage our expectations of seeing these friends socially and accepting their choices. Not our lives and as long as they’re happy, that’s all that matters.

I, for one, decided a long time ago I couldn’t be with someone who couldn’t hang with the pals, even if nowadays we only get together a few times a year. Life changes for all of us regardless.

misanthrope

(7,428 posts)
5. I found it dismal and utterly depressing
Tue Jan 16, 2018, 09:57 PM
Jan 2018

It made me glad my single years were decades back and even more grateful my wife and I met some 22 years ago.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I finally read "Cat Perso...