General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSenate Dems Need ONE MORE Vote to Pass Bill Protecting Net Neutrality
From Politics USA: Senate Democrats Reach Historic Milestone And Need 1 More Vote To Pass Bill Protecting Net Neutrality:
Senate Democrats announced today that the legislation to overturn the FCCs recent vote to repeal the net neutrality rule now has the support of all 49 Democrats in the United States Senate. Todays announcement is the latest milestone in the Democrats fight to stand up for average consumers, small business owners, and entrepreneurs. Last month, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted to repeal the 2015 Open Internet Order, which the D.C. Circuit Court upheld in 2016. The Open Internet Order prohibited internet service providers from blocking, slowing down, or discriminating against content online. Repealing the net neutrality rules could lead to higher prices for consumers, slower internet traffic, and even blocked websites.
The resolution of disapproval, which is being led by Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) and now has the support of the entire Senate Democratic caucus, would rescind FCC Chairman Ajit Pais item and fully restore the Open Internet Order. CRA resolutions allow Congress to overturn regulatory actions at federal agencies with a simple majority vote in both chambers. In accordance with the Congressional Review Act, the Senators will formally introduce the resolution after the rule is submitted to both houses of Congress and published in the federal register and then force a vote within 60 legislative days.
LisaM
(27,813 posts)Just mention this.
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)What about a tRump veto?
We've got a long ways to go before we get excited.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)The Congressional Review Act, concerning bills to overturn agency actions, prevents such bills from being filibustered.
The headline is correct that the Democrats are one vote short of passing the bill, meaning that it passes the Senate. You're correct to point to the House and Trump; enacting the bill will be much more difficult.
In fact, enacting it will probably be impossible. The main benefit of Senate passage would be that it would then have to be voted on by the House. (IIRC, the CRA means that Ryan couldn't prevent a floor vote.) Representatives who vote against it would then be on record and could be attacked this fall for that vote.
One strong possibility is that the bill will be defeated in the House by one or two votes. Some of the Republicans who don't want to anger their corporate paymasters by voting for it will also want to not anger the voters by voting against it. They'll want to vote for it (for political reasons) yet not be responsible for its passage. Ryan will grant permission for a Yea vote to endangered Republicans whose votes he doesn't need.
Another possibility is that Ryan will say the hell with it, do what you have to do for your districts, we know Trump will veto it anyway. In that case it might actually pass both houses.
Initech
(100,081 posts)Ajit Pai can go eat a steaming bag of rancid dog shit!