Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Atlantic: It would only take two U.S. senators to help end the "shithole era (Original Post) iluvtennis Jan 2018 OP
'Have you no sense of decency? elleng Jan 2018 #1
Well said. iluvtennis Jan 2018 #4
Thank you. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #6
No. They have no decency. pangaia Jan 2018 #2
They are Repukes... that means NoMoreRepugs Jan 2018 #3
how so? nt msongs Jan 2018 #5
I don't know why Corker and Flake wouldn't change parties; they could still vote the same way renate Jan 2018 #7
They love the Great Shitholio torius Jan 2018 #8
K&R smirkymonkey Jan 2018 #9

elleng

(131,123 posts)
1. 'Have you no sense of decency?
Sun Jan 14, 2018, 01:55 AM
Jan 2018

It’s the question that the members of the Republican majority in the Congress—51 senators, 239 representatives—might bear in mind, in the “shithole” era.

If only two of those senators would stand up against Donald Trump, with their votes rather than just their tweets or concerned statements, they would constitute an effective majority.

With the 49 Democratic and independent senators, these two would make 51 votes, which in turn would be enough to authorize real investigations. They could pass a formal resolution of censure. They could call for tax returns and financial disclosure. They could begin hearings, on the model of the nationally televised Watergate hearings of 45 years ago.

They could behave as if they took seriously their duties to hold the executive branch accountable. They could make a choice they know will be to their credit when this era enters history — as did the Republicans who finally turned against their own party’s President Nixon during the Watergate drama, as did the Democrats who finally turned against their own party’s President Johnson over the Vietnam war, as did the Republicans who finally turned against their own poisonous Senator McCarthy in the episode that gave rise to “Have you no sense of decency?” more than 60 years ago. They could spare themselves the shame that history attaches to people who did the wrong thing, or nothing, or kept looking the other way during those decisive periods.'

 

Sophia4

(3,515 posts)
6. Thank you.
Sun Jan 14, 2018, 03:22 AM
Jan 2018

Trump has demonstrated his racism several times now -- very clearly.

It is unacceptable that our president, as president of such a diverse nation, is such a racist. Republicans belong to the party of Abraham Lincoln. How can they ignore such an affront to so many Americans and to our entire country?

renate

(13,776 posts)
7. I don't know why Corker and Flake wouldn't change parties; they could still vote the same way
Sun Jan 14, 2018, 03:42 AM
Jan 2018

There's nothing preventing them from continuing to vote for the things Republicans like, all while switching parties to get real investigations going in the House and (although it seems better than the House's) the Senate.

Why don't they do it? I'd love to know whether the two of them have discussed it and come with some reason not to, because goodness knows they'd be hailed as heroes by 1) the majority of the population and 2) history.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Atlantic: It would on...