Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MelissaB

(16,420 posts)
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 08:10 PM Jan 2018

New: White House Official Floated Withdrawing U.S. Forces to Please Putin

White House Official Floated Withdrawing U.S. Forces to Please Putin

A member of Trump’s National Security Council staff had a radical notion: to pare back American troops in Europe as a way to curry favor with the Kremlin.


A senior National Security Council official proposed withdrawing some U.S. military forces from Eastern Europe as an overture to Vladimir Putin during the early days of the Trump administration, according to a former administration official in the room with him.

While the proposal was ultimately not adopted, it is the first known case of senior aides to Donald Trump seeking to reposition U.S. military forces to please Putin—something that smelled, to a colleague, like a return on Russia’s election-time investment in President Trump. The White House did not immediately respond to The Daily Beast's request for comment.

The official who offered the proposal, a deputy assistant to Trump for strategic planning, mused in February 2017 about withdrawing U.S. troops close to Russian borders as part of a strategy proposal to “refram[e] our interests within the context of a new relationship with Russia,” the former official told The Daily Beast, who heard this directly from the official, Kevin Harrington.

Harrington is the NSC’s senior official for strategic planning. He had neither military experience nor significant government experience before joining the White House. But he had an influential credential: as a managing director for the Thiel Macro hedge fund, he was close to Trump patron and ally Peter Thiel. Trump’s first national security adviser, retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, announced Harrington’s arrival in early February as part of a “talented group” ready to bring “fresh ideas to the table.”

More: https://www.thedailybeast.com/white-house-official-floated-withdrawing-us-forces-to-please-putin?preview=true


6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New: White House Official Floated Withdrawing U.S. Forces to Please Putin (Original Post) MelissaB Jan 2018 OP
snip MelissaB Jan 2018 #1
From the editor at the Daily Beast MelissaB Jan 2018 #2
He is a traitor but so are most of the GOP who know by name. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2018 #3
This official, Kevin Harrington, is still on the NSC. MelissaB Jan 2018 #4
This is quite an article -- people ought to read it RandomAccess Jan 2018 #5
Video from Rachel Maddow MelissaB Jan 2018 #6

MelissaB

(16,420 posts)
1. snip
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 08:13 PM
Jan 2018
According to the ex-colleague, Harrington considered it a gesture to the Kremlin that would enable the nascent Trump administration to see if its desire for a friendly relationship with Russia would be reciprocated. It was included in a strategy paper that, conspicuously to the former official, made no mention of Russia as either a competitor or adversary.

snip

Still, the former official said there was an urgency to Harrington’s exercise, and Flynn was Harrington’s primary audience for the proposal.

It was not Harrington’s only foray into unilateral gestures aimed at Russia. In March, Harrington proposed lifting U.S. sanctions on Russian oil, something an administration official justified to the Daily Beast as Harrington wondering,“if these sanctions are harming our economy without putting any pressure on Russia, what’s the point?”

snip

This fit a pattern within the Trump administration, before and after Flynn’s White House tenure, of sidling up to Russia. Taken in sum, the pattern raises a question about whether Trump and his team are willing to pay Russia back for the Kremlin’s role in the election.

Eliot Rosewater

(31,125 posts)
3. He is a traitor but so are most of the GOP who know by name.
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 08:16 PM
Jan 2018

I dont see how we avoid a problem if we arent able to remove them all.

Problem is the deplorables dont care that putin kills his opponents, kills innocent men, women and children etc.

They dont care.

They would also like to do that.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New: White House Official...