General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWould gun control advocates support limiting guns for Law Enforcement Officers?
And if not, why not.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)nt
Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)A handgun is all they need.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)I remember when they carried revolvers. Then, sometime around the 1970s/1980s, more and more of them were carrying semi-autos.
I was in college and noticed campus security carrying semi-autos. I asked a fellow student why and he said probably due to the violence of drug gangs. I thought "On campus? We have a drug-gang problem on campus that requires campus police to carry semi-autos? I don't think so!"
I think it was all a part of militarizing police departments. First, SWAT, then state, county, and city police. University campus police didn't want to be left behind...
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)meaning more money, meaning more gangs/guns.
We could do a lot to make the streets safer (for us and cops) if we'd call a ceasefire.
Vietnam was short, sweet, and sensible by comparison.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)nt
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)We aren't being invaded by any foreign armies, and there's no threat of that happening.
booley
(3,855 posts)The cops do need to be demilitarized.
But this argument is still a straw man.
Cops have guns as part of their jobs.
And they aren't gunning down people for the sake of gunning down people.
(beating up occupiers not withstanding)
KansDem
(28,498 posts)They're coming damn close!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101743169
booley
(3,855 posts)not individual initiative as in the case of mass shooters.
They are both problems. But they are different problems
movonne
(9,623 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)nt
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)They only break out the guns when there is a serious incident.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)nt