Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

shraby

(21,946 posts) Fri Jan 5, 2018, 11:35 AM Jan 2018

trump is trying to hit back with tweets, but he's flailing at the wind.

His credibility has been totally shot for a long time now. Everyone knows he's in deep doo-doo except him. The chairs on the Titanic are now on fire and there's no need to rearrange them.
Only the bow is showing pointing up in the air with the chairs making a fire tornado into the sky.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

trump is trying to hit back with tweets, but he's flailing at the wind. (Original Post) shraby Jan 2018 OP

He sounds like a F'en idiot!!! n/t RKP5637 Jan 2018 #1

Sounds like?? we can do it Jan 2018 #2

sounds/looks/acts/talks/thinks/is/was/forever ... RKP5637 Jan 2018 #3

As Stephen Colbert said to Bush at the WH Correspondents' Dinner: LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jan 2018 #4

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)

1. He sounds like a F'en idiot!!! n/t

Reply to shraby (Original post)

Fri Jan 5, 2018, 11:38 AM

Jan 2018

we can do it

(12,190 posts)

2. Sounds like??

Reply to RKP5637 (Reply #1)

Fri Jan 5, 2018, 11:51 AM

Jan 2018

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)

3. sounds/looks/acts/talks/thinks/is/was/forever ...

Reply to we can do it (Reply #2)

Fri Jan 5, 2018, 01:01 PM

Jan 2018

LastLiberal in PalmSprings

(12,588 posts)

4. As Stephen Colbert said to Bush at the WH Correspondents' Dinner:

Reply to shraby (Original post)

Sat Jan 6, 2018, 12:19 PM

Jan 2018

"Sir, there are those who say your administration is rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. I say that's not true. You are a man who aims high--you are rearranging chairs on the Hindenburg."

Reply to this discussion