General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump White House Saw Record Number of First-Year Staff Departures
President Donald Trumps first national security adviser, Michael Flynn, was fired after 25 days on the job. Two high-profile campaign aides who followed him into the White House, Reince Priebus and Steve Bannon, were gone before summers end. And his third communications directors tenure is still remembered around the West Wing as Scaramucci Week.
Those are just a few of the first-year departures from high level positions in the Trump administration, which has been marked by a level of staff turnover unprecedented in the modern era.
According to Kathryn Dunn-Tenpas, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution who has tracked White House turnover rates over three decades, the Trump administrations 34% turnover rate21 of the 61 senior officials she has tracked have resigned, been fired or reassignedis much higher than that of any other administration in the last 40 years, which is as far back as Ms. Dunn-Tenpass analysis goes. The presidency with the next-highest first-year turnover rate was Ronald Reagans, with 17% of senior aides leaving the administration in 1981.
Not only is the percentage double, the seniority of people leaving is extraordinarily high, said Ms. Dunn-Tenpas. Thats unprecedented to me. The first year always seems to have some missteps on staffing, often because the skills that worked well running a campaign dont always align with what it takes to run a government. In this case, its a president with no experience in government and people around him who also had no experience, she continued. So its not surprising that its higher than normal, but its still surprising its this high.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-white-house-saw-record-number-of-first-year-staff-departures/ar-BBHreeD?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=edgsp
Sneederbunk
(14,308 posts)NewJeffCT
(56,829 posts)I'm guessing
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)She's diagnosed the problem quite accurately: A president with no experience in government and people around him who also had no experience. That kind of crowd isn't likely to put together an infield of Cey-Lopes-Sax-Garvey.
What it means is that everything takes longer, is done poorly, and any follow-up is a hit-or-miss proposition (mostly miss).