General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"What the Democratic Party needs is blah blah blah"
Just listened to an MSNBC host (Steve Kornacki) posit the idiocy that the Democratic party needs a new face, for the umpteenth time. I think that advice may actually have been concocted in a Kremlin office.
When has anyone EVER talked about the party out of power needing a new face? NEVER! This is a strategy created to bait Democrats into self-destruction. On one edge of the sword, a new face for the Democratic party would give the GOP (Moscow) a straw person to tear down, which is much easier than having to defend child molesters and cataclysmic tax cuts for the rich. On the other edge, it scares timid Democrats into going after Nancy Pelosi who, regardless of her poor messaging ability is AMAZING AT HER JOB OF KEEPING HER CAUCUS TOGETHER.
I hope the Party ignores the bait and does the following things:
- Keeps running candidates everywhere, at every level.
- Remembers the message which includes affordable education, jobs with fair American wages, protection for the American consumer, and a government that is funded and run professionally. Basically, the same things FDR talked about.
- STOPS HELPING MOSCOW BY REPEATING THE ANTI-DEM TALKING POINTS THAT WERE DRAFTED IN MOSCOW.
The Democratic party will do what every party out of power does which is rebuild with the help of a little discipline. A "new face" of the Democratic party will emerge in 2020 which may be too early to talk about. In the meantime, if they can just avoid the invitations to implode, The 2018 wave will be real.
Wounded Bear
(58,721 posts)"New faces" need to develop organically, from the ranks moving up. Picking a party leader arbitrarily would lead to a Democratic version of Trump.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,869 posts)diva77
(7,659 posts)We need to get rid of computerized voting equipment, gerrymandering, Crosscheck, and other forms of voter suppression.
Democratic leaders say that they fear people won't vote if they think the voting equipment is rigged. The response to that should be for them to condemn the voting equipment and advocate for paper ballots, hand counted at the precinct level with public oversight; and to ban nontransparent forms of voting -- i.e. all computerized equipment -- DREs, optiscans, central tabulators, etc.
For some reason, speaking up about this problem seems to be the third rail for Dem leaders. This has to change.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)This could easily be a separate post.
msongs
(67,453 posts)Iggo
(47,571 posts)If we all voted, we'd never lose.
There really are more of us than there are of them.
Cary
(11,746 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)OneBlueDotBama
(1,385 posts)He's an idiot... period!
not fooled
(5,801 posts)Some consultant must have got hold of him and told him that to make the numbers interesting (enough for more 'Muricans) he should act like he just swallowed a bottle of amphetamines.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)of these test Narratives floated between now and April. Corporate Media wants to decide the National Political Narrative and protect their easily won tax breaks from the Democratic Wave. Kornacki has interjected the 2010 thing about voters staying home.
What people forget about how the Rethugs took over was one simple reason,we Dems left hundreds of State and local Races unchallenged. What is even worse,we left House Races uncovered. No going to happen this time around.
RandomAccess
(5,210 posts)Besides, the LAST thing the Democratic Party need to do is "manufacture" one or more Leaders.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)Culti Vader
(4 posts)Realizing that last cycles strategies did not work would be a great start. When we start ACTING inclusive, instead of just spewing our virtues, we will win. We can't expect middle America to just change cuz we are so mad. Gotta fix our shit or we will not be in the WH until 2024.
herding cats
(19,568 posts)When we show up at the polls, Dems win. Thats the main thing we gotta fix here. Getting Dems to admit people arent going to do the right thing because we belive they will just because its the right thing. We cant not get off our butts and vote because they RW will and does. Example A) Trump.
Curious, inclusive of what/who do you see as a specific issue with Democrats.
Cary
(11,746 posts)Sounds like you want us Democrats to chase our tail.
My agenda is to tune out the noise and turn out at the polls. At the moment that looks most promising, so why push some vague, complicated, divisive mush?
What's your agenda?
Kingofalldems
(38,487 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Doesn't it? Obama certainly gave the Dem Party a new face and invigorated the Party. The Dem. President, if there is one, becomes the leader of the Party.
I can see the argument for and against. The Senate & House leaders may not be in touch with certain subgroups of the Dem Party. They've been in a bubble, more or less, for many years. It's easy to lose the feel of the rank and file.
Companies regularly bring in new people - "fresh blood" they call it. Because a company benefits from the fresh perspective, the new people, the new enthusiasm that naturally wanes with the long-timers at the company.
I would think that political parties would be the same. OTOH, Pelosi is great at getting the Dems to vote together. She's very experienced at that....none better. I'm less familiar with Schumer on that score.
But it's not my decision. So...whatever. I do think the Dem Party needs to appeal to all Democrats, and not just the hardcore base, although they are critical to the party. But we have ignored some working class and middle class people, generally, IMO. We shouldn't leave the concerns of anyone out. We are all important. Even wealthy Dems. It is not a sin to be wealthy. That's what America was built on: the dream to raise your station in life (which is fast disappearing).
not fooled
(5,801 posts)in the natural course of things.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Stay the course. We've hardly given up ANY federal and state seats. We're showin' 'em!
rickford66
(5,528 posts)It's like telling the truth. You don't have trouble stating your positions.
George II
(67,782 posts)All those idiotic gyrations, he probably can't speak if he had his hands in his pockets.
ananda
(28,877 posts)The country already is !!!!!!