|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 09:56 PM Original message |
Poll question: Should someone face punishment for their speech? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
1. Well if someone says I'm going to murder you in your sleep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:02 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Not talking about criminal threats.....(I clarified the OP). I'm talking stuff that would not result |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
3. When the crazy fringe stands up with speech that's harmful - the answer is more speech. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:07 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. So it's reasonable, for example, to fine a comedian at a private venue for "insulting" someone? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Modern_Matthew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:13 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. She's great. The more vile, the better. Love shock jocks as well. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rusticus Too (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:30 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. Tom Tomorrow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Modern_Matthew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
5. Never. Not under any circumstances. Don't like something said? Thicken your skin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napoleon_in_rags (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
6. You've got to carefully define punishment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:17 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Punishment imposed by the government. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napoleon_in_rags (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:23 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. I would broaden beyond government a little to be honest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:26 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. No question.....but for now we're talking about what the government should/shouldn't do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:14 PM Response to Original message |
8. If their speech is said with the intention to intimidate minorities, then yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:19 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. So it's OK to intimidate a group considered a "majority"? I take it you don't like insult comics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frazzled (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
11. What are you talking about? A specific example? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:20 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. This is what instigated it....a lot of DU'ers are supporting the Canadian government's actions... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frazzled (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:32 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. Well, you should have said "in Canada" -- and no one seems to have been arrested |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:38 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Ummm....I never said "arrested" in the OP, I said "face punishment", last I checked, a fine by a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frazzled (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:41 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Last time I looked, the US and Canada have different laws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:44 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. So that makes it OK then, since they're just "enforcing their laws"??? Saudi Arabia can execute you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AsahinaKimi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
14. It would be nice to know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:28 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Depends. Does the hate speech constitute a threat or a call for violence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AsahinaKimi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:29 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. again.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:35 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Public shunning/condemnation/etc. But criminal punishment for non-threat hate speech is a slippery |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AsahinaKimi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:41 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. So lets say someone like a right wing radio announcer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:46 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Obviously that constitutes a criminal threat and is not protected under any free speech provisions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AsahinaKimi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:52 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. I was just asking a question ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:59 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. It's just the fact that saying "X should be killed" is completely different than "I hate X" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
28. After seeing the French burka law in effect I'm against the idea of thought crimes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 08th 2024, 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC