|
And journalists have been conferred some special professional rights to protect sources and such. However, the popular, big-money media is no longer the ink-stained wretch of yore, and is more likely to be working with corrupt folks in government than to do anything to betray them. You can tell who's hand-in-glove by watching things like Wikileaks. Who's focused on Assange and his alleged misdeeds, and who is actually looking through what's been published?
The folks you mention in your second paragraph enjoy a very fluid status. They get to be "journalists" when they are very earnest and want to be taken seriously. But when their bias becomes too naked, then they revert to their back-up status as "commentator," folks who are supposed to take a position. And when they flat-out lie or their cutesy little act offends even some of their supporters, then they morph into "entertainers" who aren't really meant to be taken seriously alongside the likes of Williams, Couric or Sawyer, and hey, lighten up folks!
|