Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Journalists Schmernalists!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-10 12:06 PM
Original message
Journalists Schmernalists!
There is a weird fucked up mentality that says journalists are sacred and should have special rights. Where the hell did that come from? As if journalists are without fault or sin or unwilling to be bribed or lie. Insane. It would be wonderful if there were robot writers incapable of error or prostitution.

Just remember, O'reilly, Beck, Miller, Coulter, et al. consider themselves journalists. Journalists have the unique distinction of having graduated from a school of journalism! Big fucking deal. Doctors take a Hippocratic oath. Most Journalists piss on the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Journalism is clearly an odd duck
There are no certifications or effective professional standards. Anyone with a website or blog can claim journalist status. For every highly held name there are three that are muckrakers of the highest order. Hearst and Pegler come to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-10 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, there's that free speech/free press thing
And journalists have been conferred some special professional rights to protect sources and such. However, the popular, big-money media is no longer the ink-stained wretch of yore, and is more likely to be working with corrupt folks in government than to do anything to betray them. You can tell who's hand-in-glove by watching things like Wikileaks. Who's focused on Assange and his alleged misdeeds, and who is actually looking through what's been published?

The folks you mention in your second paragraph enjoy a very fluid status. They get to be "journalists" when they are very earnest and want to be taken seriously. But when their bias becomes too naked, then they revert to their back-up status as "commentator," folks who are supposed to take a position. And when they flat-out lie or their cutesy little act offends even some of their supporters, then they morph into "entertainers" who aren't really meant to be taken seriously alongside the likes of Williams, Couric or Sawyer, and hey, lighten up folks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-10 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. It comes from the constitution. It's one of the only professions
named in it, iirc:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-10 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Journalists used to be a huge force for good and a watchdog on corporations & gov't
officials. Now, sadly things have changed dramatically for the worst. No longer do they "comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable," instead, they make the comfortable even more comfortable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC