Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

As someone whose taxes will go up, I say....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 02:00 PM
Original message
As someone whose taxes will go up, I say....
Good Show!

As someone who's household income in the the top 1%, I agree that we are going to have to raise revenue, and the President was right to say so.

As someone who works in the Government and can see inefficiences in both management and labor, I agree that spending should be trimmed, and the President was right to say so.

As someone who is politically active, I agree that the Republican alternative proposals are dangerous, and the President was right to say so.

And, as someone who is politically aware, I have learned that the public wants a mainstream bipartisan solution, rather than an appeal to the philosophy of one side or the other, and the President was right to say so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. As a California homeowner, I say "Eliminate Prop 13"!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. AMEN!!!!!
Prop 13 need to go, NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. as someone who doesn't live in California and too lazy to google...
what is Prop 13 again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. "Initiative to Limit Property Taxation"
Edited on Wed Apr-13-11 02:53 PM by Taverner
Proposition 13 (officially named the People's Initiative to Limit Property Taxation) was an amendment of the Constitution of California enacted during 1978, by means of the initiative process. It was approved by California voters on June 6, 1978. It was declared constitutional by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Nordlinger v. Hahn, 505 U.S. 1 (1992). Proposition 13 is embodied in Article 13A of the Constitution of the State of California.

The most significant portion of the act is the first paragraph, which limited the tax rate for real estate:

Section 1. (a) The maximum amount of any ad valorem tax on real property shall not exceed one percent (1%) of the full cash value of such property. The one percent (1%) tax to be collected by the counties and apportioned according to law to the districts within the counties.

The proposition decreased property taxes by assessing property values at their 1975 value and restricted annual increases of assessed value of real property to an inflation factor, not to exceed 2% per year. It also prohibited reassessment of a new base year value except for (a) change in ownership or (b) completion of new construction.

In addition to decreasing property taxes, the initiative also contained language requiring a two-thirds majority in both legislative houses for future increases of any state tax rates or amounts of revenue collected, including income tax rates. It also requires a two-thirds vote majority in local elections for local governments wishing to increase special taxes. Proposition 13 received an enormous amount of publicity, not only in California, but throughout the United States.

EDITED FOR SPELLING


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposition_13
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. I agree!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm guessing that there are many in your financial situation that will
agree with you. That's good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nothing about jobs. As someone who is unemployed
that's a big disappointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Nothing about jobs in his Libya speech either...
This was about the deficit. Not saying your situation isn't important, but you don't put everything in every speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Increasing jobs would increase the tax base
Yes jobs are a part of deficit reduction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Which argues the underlying position that the productivity of American workers
is not an important element in our economy as seen from DC, doesn't it.

It's as though the government has forgotten entirely why it exists or how it is funded.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. +1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. The rich pay the same tax I do.
I make about 35k and the rich pay the same tax I do on their first 35K. They pay more on the greater amount, which I'd be more than willing to do to make what they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. Mayor Bloomberg?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. I have no problem with higher taxes, but I know some people....
who will be absolutely outraged.

I don't even want to check my email.

Sonoman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. Nowhere near that, and I don't care my taxes go up by $150 or not
Anyone to whom that amount would make a difference in their yearly budget just isn't paying income tax at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlancheSplanchnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
16. I'm with you--
anyone of conscience would agree. (Which is why the Corporate Fascists disagree.)

KnR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC