Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

60 minutes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
plcdude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:24 AM
Original message
60 minutes
I would be interested in your reactions to the 60 minutes expose on why corporations are avoiding American tax obligations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Corporations and their owners want all the profits, none of the costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Hope you don't mind me sqeezing in here but, here's the transcript
and accompanying videos for those of us who didn't get to see 60 Minutes:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/03/25/60minutes/main20046867.shtml?tag=contentMain;cbsCarousel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plcdude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. very good
thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. No expose there. It was a blatant shout out to the U.S. that if
we lowered our taxes even more on the corporations, they would come back to the fold...but lower than all other countries. Jobs would stay wherever they wanted them to. The only thing that would come back would be the headquarters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plcdude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. I think what was exposed
is the blatant avoidance of responsibility on the part of these corporations(now regarded as individuals)to meet legal requirements. Why not take their lobbying budgets and buy a lower corporate tax rate(ctr)from congress? I think it is not so much a question of ctr as it is cheaper labor and an escape from regulatory safe guards resulting in a greater profit margin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
19. If we had a Democratic President who would stand up to corporations,
he/she would say: "Go ahead move overseas, move to where you can pay slave wages for child labor BUT don't expect to be able to sell your crap here in the US. We will be enforcing (Make up a law - like the trust busting laws that all presidents since Raygun have ignored. Let's face it we don't pay any attention to laws anymore anyway. It's powerful people's whims that count.) and charging a 50% tariff on all goods imported into the US by GE, or whatever corporation that's into dealing crap.

These corporation do NOT have a God given Right to sell their crap here in the US. The same goes for states. If a corporation decides to blackmail a state by saying give us a tax cut or we move all the jobs to Texas, say go right ahead. But every tractor, or whatever crap they sell, that comes into the state will have a 50% tractor sales tax. Tractor's are so bad for the environment we need a special sales tax to compensate. Let the corporation file suit. By the time it's through the court, they would have lost a good chunk of money.

But unfortunately we have very few Democratic Governors and no Democratic President in sight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. It was a great show - the greed of corporations contrasted by that woman doing
the healing prep-work for the children of Iraq, Afghanistan, Haiti, China etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. My thought was that if 30,000 corp. are paying taxes to Zug the street should
be paved with gold. Didn't look like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chef Donating Member (453 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. 60 Minutes
I thought about the contrast between the corporate tax story and the basketball coach. The coach could have gone for the big bucks but stayed with the $9,000 per year job coaching intercity youth to successful lives. If the Cisco CEO took the same approach as the coach he would have said "we are an American Company. We made it here because America is a great country and we do most of our business here. So, we will stay here and pay the tax rate that applies to American companies". But, no. Instead it came across as the speech to Howard Beal in Network. In addition, why can't I take my "taxable self" to a place where there are no income taxes so I can enjoy the benefits of this country without paying for them? The system we have allowed to exist is not for the benefit of the majority of us but, for the benefit of the investor class. Also, the last I heard, Ireland with their 12.5% corporate tax rate wasn't doing so hot. I might be interested in letting corporations have a low rate if in return we had universal health care and a reasonable social safety net.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
plcdude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. not sure what
you are referring to here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. Why Didn't Leslie Stahl Point Out to the Cisco CEO That The Other Developed Nations with Low Taxes
Edited on Mon Mar-28-11 10:50 AM by Yavin4
also don't spend $700 billion a year on defense, and they have single payer health care which allows them to lower costs by doing such things as negotiating the price of prescription drugs.

Why didn't Stahl point that out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Stahl pointed out what the corporations wanted pointed out
no more, no less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrmpa Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. Here's how I see it......
Edited on Mon Mar-28-11 10:19 AM by mrmpa
American Corps. are taxed at 35%, yet we hear too often that corps. paid no taxes, because of all the loopholes, deductions, that our IRS code allows. So, we have a percentage, that companies really don't pay.

Ireland has a 12.5% rate, but I don't know if they have all the deductions, etc. that the US has. Let's say Ireland does, then it has a percentage that the corps. don't pay. Zero payment is zero payment. I say it's more about wages than anything else.

Someone interviewed on 60 minutes, stated that bottom line, it was about giving back to the shareholders. Well, I think that the most important shareholder(s) are the taxpayers in the US.

We don't buy Sara Lee products in my house, because a number of years ago, I learned that their mission statement said nothing about the product they produced or the consumers who bought the products, but was all about giving the best return to their investors.

I'm not a tax lawyer, or an expert, but I know that our Tax code needs cleaned up. I propose a straight 10% tax on corporate net profits. A straight 1% to 5% tax on individual investment profits, e.g. if you invested $10,000 in ABC corp. and at end of year it was worth $15,000 you would pay $150 to $750 in taxes.

That's how I see it, but I haven't put my contact lenses in yet.

:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamtechus Donating Member (868 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Ireland is a good example
They can have a low tax rate because they have no army, navy or air force to support. Neither do they have a space program. Also, they don't feel obligated to be a world cop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Distant Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
14. The fix has been in for a while. The rich will get richer, etc. and Obama can't do
even the most minute thing about it -- eg. let the Bush tax cuts expire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
16. One word answer...GREED! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whattheidonot Donating Member (301 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. no extra jobs.
also it was pointed out that little extra jobs are created by a tax cut which is what the corporations always push. That is the correlation between tax cuts and more jobs is minimal at best. another corporate lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. ...and why is it that the corps fail to create the extra jobs? Greed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC