|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-23-11 11:48 PM Original message |
If we have enough money to fight Libya, then we dont need to cut any social programs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
somone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-23-11 11:52 PM Response to Original message |
1. What deficit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 12:13 AM Response to Original message |
2. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Casual_Observer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 12:15 AM Response to Original message |
3. The military spending argument is won on the basis of national security |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
4. Aha.... but that's the trick -- there is ALWAYS money for war -- and it's why ultimately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mimosa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 12:37 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Defend and Protect, you always nail it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 01:21 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Agree -- and every dollar anyone had pre-"W" is now worth 40 cents/50 cents ... !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 07:48 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adsos Letter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 04:02 AM Response to Original message |
7. I can agree with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DragonSlave (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 04:36 AM Response to Original message |
8. Federal Government spending is not revenue constrained |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 07:55 AM Response to Original message |
10. I think the general concensus in DC is that social programs be cut to ALLOW for funding war. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 10:59 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. BINGO! there's THAT and pure, unadulterated GREED. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
_ed_ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
11. The Tomahawk Cruise missiles or LIHEAP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zorahopkins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
12. Cut the War Budget and Tax The Rich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 01:32 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I can agree! In fact the majority of Americans, not just Dems agree. Let's get er done, Obama! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MedleyMisty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 08:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. I agree on that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lildreamer316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
15. Stealing this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 04:23 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. No at all : ) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
17. great way to say it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Waiting For Everyman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
19. Can definitely agree on that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
revolutionnow45 (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
20. WE never needed to cut social programs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrmpa (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
21. bravo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
22. You *do* have enough money; it's just distributed very badly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Autumn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
23. K/R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femmocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
24. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 08:44 PM Response to Original message |
25. i agree wholeheartedly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC