:smoke:
My,my,my,my,my!
Why is that Tucker? Would it be to avert any perception of a ' CONFLICT Of INTEREST '?
Don't you think SAME policy standard employed by the DailytCaller ( so you claim ) should also be an even higher standard set for all Supreme Court Justices including Clarence Thomas?
" Buried in that curriculum vitae are potential conflicts of interest -- past clients who may become sources, or subjects of articles. In a phone interview today, Carlson explained his standard to me.
"Nobody here is going to be interviewing anybody from whom he or she takes money," he said emphatically.
It's unclear whether Thomas has any ongoing business relationships with her political clients. When asked whether such relationships might still exist, Carlson said he didn't know. :rofl:....well maybe it would be in your interest to find out
The website for her firm Liberty Consulting was down as of Tuesday morning.
In cases where Thomas' subjects or sources as a reporter are former clients, Carlson says the Caller will address disclosure on a case by case basis.
"It's case by case," he said, "you can fairly easily think of circumstances in which that would be unacceptable, and other cases in which it would be acceptable."
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/03/carlson-ginni-thomas-will-not-interview-or-write-about-business-clients.php?ref=fpb
.