|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Amerigo Vespucci (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:03 AM Original message |
Kucinich: Obama could be impeached for attacking Libya |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zoeisright (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
1. Yeah, that's just what we need. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richardo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
2. Let's impeach EVERY president from now on!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amerigo Vespucci (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:06 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Richardo, I'm not 100% sure, but I think you could possibly be impeached for saying that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
razorman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:43 AM Response to Reply #2 |
34. It will certainly be tried. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richardo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:50 AM Response to Reply #34 |
39. I fully agree - impeachment used to be the hydrogen bomb of politics... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
razorman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:09 AM Response to Reply #39 |
50. You are right. But to be fair, it is not only a GOP fault. Recall all the voices |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richardo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:32 AM Response to Reply #50 |
63. You're right, not just a GOP issue. I was a consistent nay-sayer against impeaching GWB |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
3. Let's go with elect'em - impeach'em. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthside (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
5. Agree or disagree ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Godhumor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:07 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Kucinich is consistently a self-aggrandizing blowhard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FSogol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:43 AM Response to Reply #8 |
33. +1 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReggieVeggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:13 AM Response to Reply #8 |
52. self-aggrandizing toward what end? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Godhumor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:28 AM Response to Reply #52 |
59. His own publicity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReggieVeggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:52 AM Response to Reply #59 |
77. really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Godhumor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:58 AM Response to Reply #77 |
78. Because he is in love with his own fame and always has been--it is why his record is so awful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReggieVeggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 12:46 PM Response to Reply #78 |
89. So he said what he said for notoriety? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Godhumor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 01:22 PM Response to Reply #89 |
97. Notoriety, hence bringing full circle to self-aggrandizing. He's a do-nothing. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 04:28 PM Response to Reply #97 |
115. What about these Democrats? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 02:58 PM Response to Reply #78 |
101. you are so wrong! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Godhumor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 03:23 PM Response to Reply #101 |
110. I know he is well liked by many here, and I have no problem with that. To me, he is all bark no bite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 03:40 PM Response to Reply #78 |
111. shirley mclaine made the claim that kucinich saw a ufo.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 12:47 PM Response to Reply #8 |
90. What has he been wrong about on major issues? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Godhumor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 01:21 PM Response to Reply #90 |
96. He spends so much time on self-advertising he contributes nothing that actually gets passed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 02:54 PM Response to Reply #96 |
99. I have looked at his legislative record, in fact I have posted it here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeunderdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-11 04:13 PM Response to Reply #99 |
125. Stop. You are asking people to address content |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 03:05 PM Response to Reply #96 |
104. Hey godhumor, relaxe....Kuchie said, "could" not should...wtf is up your ass anyway? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Godhumor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 03:13 PM Response to Reply #104 |
107. I am relaxed, I just don't like Kucinich. No matter how it is parsed he mentioned the word impeach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 04:31 PM Response to Reply #107 |
116. Okay so you don't like HIM. But he is not the only Democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:10 AM Response to Reply #5 |
12. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Motown_Johnny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:10 AM Response to Reply #5 |
13. consistently represents the views of about 1% of the country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:14 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Apparently, if 1% is accurate, the 1% with the most intelligence and integrity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Motown_Johnny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:37 AM Response to Reply #16 |
27. the self deluded 1% This is not illegal in any way and not impeachable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 04:01 PM Response to Reply #27 |
114. Can you please explain that? Was Libya about to attack the U.S.? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkofos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:27 AM Response to Reply #13 |
22. But it's not the top1% that the big O supports. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:12 AM Response to Reply #5 |
14. More consistent, and I agree with him more often than not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 03:18 PM Response to Reply #14 |
108. I agree with LWolf |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bumblebee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:03 AM Response to Reply #5 |
46. yes, consistently stupid and useless. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
6. Now that's what I can a REAL dilemma for republicans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
7. He'll be hearing from lots of actual Democrats. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:09 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. and then he flew away on his magic unicorn, back to the enchanted shoe... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:27 AM Response to Reply #10 |
21. Well, damn. Was that UFO a unicorn the whole time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:31 AM Response to Reply #7 |
25. If they are "actual Democrats", then I assume they will be offering their support. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:48 AM Response to Reply #25 |
37. So you think Obama should be impeached? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:54 AM Response to Reply #25 |
41. considering Obama's approval rating among self-identified Democrats runs 75% + I'd say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Motown_Johnny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
9. just looks foolish, The War Powers Act Dennis, have someone look it up for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:28 AM Response to Reply #9 |
24. There should have been at least a discussion of Presidential intent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:42 AM Response to Reply #24 |
32. The Utter Dysfunction Of Congress At Present, Ma'am, Requires This Formality Be Foregone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 02:57 PM Response to Reply #32 |
100. Utter dysfunction of Congress is, sadly, a chronic condition. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 03:47 PM Response to Reply #100 |
112. It Is Past the Usual At This Point, Ma'am, Unfortunately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rustydog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
11. Why not? Newtered Gingrich lead an impeachment of Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:12 AM Original message |
Deleted message |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
15. The Dude has gone SOUR....WTF Dennis?...Just destroy Obama why doncha? Palin & Compnay must LOVE YOU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkofos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
17. Is impeachment on boner's table?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marblehead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
18. technically yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monique1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:26 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. DK lost me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marblehead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:38 AM Response to Reply #20 |
28. he still makes more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:44 AM Response to Reply #18 |
35. The thing is..this is NOT a war. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WingDinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
19. OMG, this is horseshit, coming out of KUCINICH! Not good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
23. His office does not deny that Kucinich said it. I just called. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:26 AM Response to Reply #23 |
58. Dennis won't have to worry about that too much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:32 AM Response to Reply #58 |
64. Well, that's true. I hate gerrymandering. I'd rather contribute to his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:39 AM Response to Reply #64 |
68. But that's what happens when the voters sit home. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:45 AM Response to Reply #68 |
70. Yes it is. Wow, they really showed the Dem Party who's boss, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 12:30 PM Response to Reply #70 |
81. What do you mean Kasich is a Wall Street tool, intent on selling Ohio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 12:33 PM Response to Reply #81 |
83. Funny, when they lobby so hard for people to stay home and not vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 12:38 PM Response to Reply #83 |
85. "I'm not voting in the mid-term elections!", thundered Big Eddie Schultz, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
26. Let's Impeach Obama while Bush and Cheney enjoy their retirement!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:39 AM Response to Reply #26 |
29. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReggieVeggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:14 AM Response to Reply #26 |
53. Kucinich called for Bush's impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 12:45 PM Response to Reply #53 |
87. He knew nothing would come of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReggieVeggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 05:21 PM Response to Reply #87 |
120. OH! So calling for impeachment knowing it wouldn't happen IS BETTER than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthside (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:36 AM Response to Reply #26 |
67. It was Kucinich ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Akoto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
30. Impeached for what? He has 60 days under the War Powers Act. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
31. Do you people see what Obama is dealing with in Congress? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
36. The point is: A President does not have the Constitutional authority to bomb |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:50 AM Response to Reply #36 |
38. So you think Obama should be impeached, too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:52 AM Response to Reply #38 |
76. Absolutely not. I think he could be impeached. Big difference. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Akoto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:59 AM Response to Reply #36 |
44. Which law did he violate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:49 AM Response to Reply #44 |
72. The War Powers Resolution of 1973. You posted only a small interpretaiton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 12:32 PM Response to Reply #44 |
82. Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 of the United States Constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLPanhandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
40. Shit like this is why Kucinich has no credibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:55 AM Response to Reply #40 |
42. Call Dennis and tell him what you think about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amerigo Vespucci (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:04 AM Response to Reply #42 |
47. Error message on your link: "The parameter is incorrect." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:07 AM Response to Reply #47 |
48. Works for me. Wonder why. But thanks, just in case other people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bumblebee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:08 AM Response to Reply #42 |
49. why waste one's breath? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:17 AM Response to Reply #49 |
54. I told his phone person that I'll donate to any primary challenger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:49 AM Response to Reply #54 |
73. Deleted message |
Amerigo Vespucci (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:24 AM Response to Reply #49 |
57. Contacting any politician could be considered "wasting one's breath"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:29 AM Response to Reply #57 |
60. When I called, it was first to ask if he had indeed said it. I wanted to make sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:55 AM Response to Reply #40 |
43. +1000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
45. Shouldn't he be doing something more useful, like protecting us from olive pits? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
51. "Kucinich asked why the U.S. missile strikes were not impeachable offenses" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
55. Introduce the articles, Dennis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:21 AM Response to Reply #55 |
56. I doubt he has the courage of his conviction. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:30 AM Response to Reply #56 |
61. What are you talking about? Consider Dennis' stellar legislative record, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:31 AM Response to Reply #61 |
62. But he did see a UFO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Union Scribe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:50 AM Response to Reply #56 |
74. Do you? Are you enlisting yet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:58 AM Response to Reply #74 |
79. I'm a veteran. US Army. 98G2LRU. Thank you for YOUR service. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 12:48 PM Response to Reply #79 |
91. Ouch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 12:54 PM Response to Reply #91 |
95. Hahaha. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tallahasseedem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 03:22 PM Response to Reply #79 |
109. Well that just about wrapped things up! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
65. Awww. Isn't that cute? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sky Masterson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
66. Dear Dennis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
69. I have to hand it to Kucinich. He knows how to raise funds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:46 AM Response to Reply #69 |
71. I called his office and said I'm donating to any Dem who primaries him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Union Scribe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:50 AM Response to Reply #71 |
75. I'm sure that $14 is going to be the clincher. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 12:04 PM Response to Reply #75 |
80. So now you're making fun of people's economic status? How very "progressive" of you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Union Scribe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-11 01:06 AM Response to Reply #80 |
124. Lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #69 |
84. Hollywood saved his seat the last time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
86. He's asking why the double standard for Bush and Obama, and he's right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 12:45 PM Response to Reply #86 |
88. "double standard "? The two |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReggieVeggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 12:48 PM Response to Reply #88 |
92. and the Democrat complicity? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 01:24 PM Response to Reply #86 |
98. LOL, too true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StarburstClock (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 03:12 PM Response to Reply #86 |
106. Excellent points, thank you for making them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 05:15 PM Response to Reply #86 |
119. That's in the upper decks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 11:07 PM Response to Reply #86 |
123. A great big +1 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
93. Thank you Dennis for your moral consistency and watching out for the constitution n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
94. With the UN behind it, it's hard to imagine that could be right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 03:01 PM Response to Reply #94 |
103. UN or not it is our Constitution that must stand before any UN approval. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:59 PM Response to Reply #103 |
122. Our Constitution allows for treaties |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
102. Well not yet at least |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
105. Deleted message |
Ramulux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
113. I haven't seen anyone even bother |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 08:23 PM Response to Reply #113 |
121. War powers act |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
117. Apparently, its only a crime when the black guys does it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
118. Did you read the headline? Or the story? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 04:33 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC