Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LA Times spin on - Radiation Headed for California

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 01:19 AM
Original message
LA Times spin on - Radiation Headed for California
http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-japan-nuclear-usa-20110317,0,1431467.story

Atmospheric experts said the material should begin showing up on the West Coast as early as Friday, though it could take up to an additional week for the 5,000-mile trip from Japan to Southern California. Although the organization has told its member countries that the first indication of radiation would hit on Friday, the plume from a North Korean nuclear test in 2006 took about two weeks to travel to North America, U.N. officials said.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which oversees the U.S. nuclear industry, said Wednesday that it did not expect dangerous levels of radioactivity to hit the West Coast, Hawaii, Alaska or U.S. territories in the Pacific. But whatever levels reach the U.S. initially are likely to increase in subsequent days, because radioactive emissions from the damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant have grown since the disaster began Friday. The NRC sharply raised its warning to American citizens in Japan, urging them to evacuate an area within 50 miles of the Fukushima complex. Japanese authorities have ordered an evacuation within about 12 miles of the plant.

-- more at link

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wait a sec, they mentioned PLUTONIUM folks
Of particular concern, however, is Fukushima's No. 3 reactor. It uses plutonium fuel, which poses a special health risk even in small quantities if fallout from that reactor were to reach U.S. shores.

This is what has me very concerned since supposedly one molecule can do big damage. Any insight appreciated by the more nuclearly inclined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. See what I said about filters
Plutonium is fairly heavy... so I am hoping it falls though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. So we have to wonder if the journalist researched that
lots of bad info will be circulated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I fear Rachel is our only hope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Rachel is ahead of the curve, and honest nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtuck004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Reactor 3 uses a fuel called MOX

...Specifically, MOX fuel refers to a blend of plutonium and natural uranium, reprocessed uranium, or depleted uranium. ...reactors that predominate nuclear power generation...

here...

Unless you are in the 50-mile zone around the reactor you may not have much to worry about. It is the perhaps the most powerful of the fuels in use there, and something they may well be concentrating on - i.e. why they dropped water on that and 4.

Most of the sources I have read say unless the core on #3 blows up and spews plutonium into the air, the risk from that fuel in the U.S. is minimal, at least from Japan. There is little discussion of the steam that is coming out, and even though contaminated most likely would not rise to the level of jumping on the jetstream and hitching a ride to Seattle. That still leaves the products of the accidents at the others, not likely to be as hazardous this far away.

The biggest problem is likely to be in that 50 mile radius around the plant. For 800 years or more.

Be optomistic about this, unless you see a reactor blow up and fly into the sky. I suspect our government is monitoring this, and if there was anything much greater than the normal radiation we eat, and use to see broken bones, get while flying, etc, they would be all over us about stockpiling duct tape and plastic sheeting. Again. I don't see the upside for them to let a lot of people get sick the year before and during an election. The only group that might see the good side of that is the Westboro Baptist Church, and they are delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. They changed the filters on the equipment
at least in Orange County, so they set the gear as close to "zero"

I expect to be minimal, but as I keep saying, look what they do, not what they say
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newest Reality Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think it is common knowledge by now that
plutonium is one of the baddest mojos. Time and time again I have read about the potency of it. Maybe somebody can refute this, but I understand that just one speck of plutonium in your lungs is a death sentence because it guarantees you will die of terminal lung cancer just by its presence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Define "speck."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
10. Seems darkly, strangely poetic that Japan might be the source of our radiation exposure. n/t
Edited on Thu Mar-17-11 03:24 AM by Dover
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC