it always surprises me that people actually think any NEWS organigation is anything more than a for-profit corporation. They do what they have to do to bring in the most revenue dollars. They're mandated by law to do that and I'm guessing they get more views on Weekends when they run lockup than when they run news. :shrug:
This is why we need an Al Jazeera-type of news, not owned by anyone, not owing TO anyone. They initially wanted to be self-supporting after receiving a loan, but that wasn't achieved so they continued to get loans and now sell advertising and other things to keep going, Admirable.
From Wiki:
The original Al Jazeera channel was started in 1996 by an emiri decree with a loan of 500 million Qatari riyals (US$137 million) from the Emir of Qatar, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa.<1><2> By its funding through loans or grants rather than direct government subsidies, the channel claims to maintain independent editorial policy.<3><4> The channel began broadcasting in late 1996, with many staff joining from the BBC World Service's Saudi-co-owned Arabic language TV station, which had shut down in April 1996 after two years of operation because of censorship demands by the Saudi Arabian government.<5>
Following the initial grant from the Emir of Qatar, Al Jazeera had aimed to become self-sufficient through advertising by 2001, but when this failed to occur, the Emir agreed to several consecutive loans<2> on a year-by-year basis (US$30 million in 2004,<6> according to Arnaud de Borchgrave). Other major sources of income include advertising, cable subscription fees, broadcasting deals with other companies, and sale of footage.<7> In 2000, advertising accounted for 40% of the station's revenue.<8>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Jazeera