Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Over 90 percent of nursing homes hire criminals

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 04:31 AM
Original message
Over 90 percent of nursing homes hire criminals


By CBS News investigative producer Laura Strickler.

More than 90 percent of nursing homes hired employees with criminal convictions according to a new government report obtained by CBS News.

Government investigators ran background checks on all workers who were employed on June 1, 2009 at 260 nursing homes across the country. The results showed 92 percent of the facilities hired at least one employee with a criminal conviction.

The report, by the Inspector General for Health and Human Services, also says that at nearly half of the nursing homes, "five or more individuals" with criminal backgrounds were hired.

Investigators found seven registered sex offenders employed in five different nursing homes. Overall 43 percent of the criminal convictions were for property crimes such as "burglary, shoplifting, writing bad checks."

Forty-three states require nursing homes to conduct some kind of criminal background check. But, only ten states require both a state and FBI background check that would detect convictions in multiple states.

<snip>

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31727_162-20038384-10391695.html?tag=stack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jmaxfie1 Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. "seven registered sex offenders", That's scary:( n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Maybe, but consider what can get you put on a sex offender list these days
Pee in a public allyway and get caught? In some states thats enough to get you put on a sex offender list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jmaxfie1 Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. True, people have gone crazy as far as who is a "sex offender".
Hopefully it was only this type of offense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
athenasatanjesus Donating Member (592 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. What's the problem?
I'm sure the number gets inflated by a lot of petty crimes and employees that committed their crimes while they were young.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R- So so many private "Security" agencies.....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Ditto many agencies and facilities serving handicapped and ...
..... mentally disabled and mentally ill .

No one else wants to do this work 'cause the $$ is so low and there's no security or benefits.


You can start making room on the list for public schools for the same reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. Considering the number of people who either are, have been, or will be
incarcerated this is not surprising.

Are people not expected to work following their release?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. +10000 they've served their time. Let 'em work, if appropriate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Depends on the crime and when it was. Sex/abuse should not be allowed to work with these population
Writing a bad check 15 yrs ago and clean record since? They could be hired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Because it's so much better having criminals stay unemployed
That will really cut down on recidivism :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. You can thank the managed care lobby for that...
Edited on Thu Mar-03-11 04:46 PM by Shagbark Hickory
"But, only ten states require both a state and FBI background check that would detect convictions in multiple states."

For the right price, you can get any law passed you want. You can even get a really lax, watered down bill passed to give the illusion that people have some kind of protections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. I have a criminal conviction
I failed to pay a speeding ticket in 1994 (when I was 19) and was arrested for it during a later traffic stop.

Those stats are a little bit questionable without knowing what the offenses were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC