Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wisconsin Lawmakers Want to Ban Prank Calls

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 09:47 AM
Original message
Wisconsin Lawmakers Want to Ban Prank Calls
Polidicks

Legislators in Wisconsin, where Gov. Scott Walker was recently on the business end of an embarrassing prank telephone call, have decided that it is in their state's best interest to ban prank calls. A bill currently circulating in the Wisconsin legislature, authored by Sen. Mary Lazich and Rep. Mark Honadel, both Republicans, would prevent callers from using fake voices, or phone numbers, in order to "defraud, cause harm or wrongfully obtain any information of value from" the person on the other end of the line; those found guilty of prank calls could be subject to fines of as much as $10,000.

Not that this has anything to do with Gov. Walker's recent telephone conversation with a person he believed to be billionaire conservative activist David Koch. No! Indeed, the University of Wisconsin Badger Herald writes that "the authors of the bill denied any relationship" between their proposed legislation and the recent newsworthy example of the very behavior their bill seeks to prevent, and of course we believe them, because it would be deeply distressing if two lawmakers were taking their legislative cues from the embarrassing exploits of their state governor. But, on further reflection, of course Lazich and Honadel's bill is entirely disconnected from the egg on Gov. Walker's face—"David Koch" was calling from Buffalo, N.Y., and Wisconsin would likely find it difficult to enforce this law in New York.

http://gawker.com/#!5774093/wisconsin-lawmakers-want-to-ban-pank-calls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. We'll settle for the people's right to eavesdrop and phone tap
in a quid pro quo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. And those protest signs, we don't need those!
Let's ban them to! And that free speech stuff, it's gotta go.

And why do we need democrats on the ballots? Shouldn't they be banned, as well?

While we're at it, can we get more tax cuts for the rich?






/sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well
Edited on Wed Mar-02-11 09:56 AM by Proud Liberal Dem
if there's nothing to hide and all that..................:eyes: :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. But it would be okay to use "a" real voice
or "a" real number?
" would prevent callers from using fake voices, or phone numbers,"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. While they're at it, why don't they ban the color chartreuse?
After all, it's a fraudulent misrepresentation of the color "snot green"

(sorry for the gross-out, but mucus won the word-association with Republicans hands down)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. Good luck on enforcing that. The call they're pissed about was from out of state.
(As mentioned in the last part of the OP.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. KO was right to call Walker "Wisconsin’s pet rock of a chief executive".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janet118 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. Hello . . . Can you page Senator Pat Magroin? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
9. Why because the asshat didn't look at his caller ID.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. Gotten a bit touchy in the Wisconsin State Capitol, have they?
nt


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC