Excellent article: In Indiana, Clues to Future of Wisconsin Labor

[cali]

By STEVEN GREENHOUSE
Published: February 26, 2011

<snip>

The experience of a nearby state, Indiana, where Gov. Mitch Daniels eliminated bargaining for state employees six years ago, shows just how much is at stake, both for the government and for workers. His 2005 executive order has had a sweeping impact: no raises for state employees in some years, a weakening of seniority preferences and a far greater freedom to consolidate state operations or outsource them to private companies.

Evaluating the success of the policy depends on where you sit.

“It’s helped us in a thousand ways. It was absolutely central to our turnaround here,” Mr. Daniels said in an interview. Without union contracts to slow him down, he said, it has been easy for him to merge the procurement operations of numerous state agencies, saving millions of dollars. One move alone — outsourcing and consolidating food service operations for Indiana’s 28 prisons — has saved the state $100 million since 2005, he said. Such moves led to hundreds losing their jobs.

For state workers in Indiana, the end of collective bargaining also meant a pay freeze in 2009 and 2010 and higher health insurance payments. Several state employees said they now paid $5,200 a year in premiums, $3,400 more than when Mr. Daniels took office, though there are cheaper plans available. Earlier in his tenure, Mr. Daniels adopted a merit pay system, with some employees receiving no raises and those deemed to be top performers getting up to 10 percent.

For state workers in Indiana, the end of collective bargaining also meant a pay freeze in 2009 and 2010 and higher health insurance payments. Several state employees said they now paid $5,200 a year in premiums, $3,400 more than when Mr. Daniels took office, though there are cheaper plans available. Earlier in his tenure, Mr. Daniels adopted a merit pay system, with some employees receiving no raises and those deemed to be top performers getting up to 10 percent.

<snip>

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/27/business/27collective-bargain.html?_r=2&hp

[liberal N proud]

1. Exactly what will happen where ever collective bargaining is taken away

and the take aways will escalate with time.

[Chipper Chat]

2. My sister-in-law is 61.

SHe had a job with the Indiana state welfare food stamp division and loved it until Mitch the Bitch took away the collective baragining and her job was privatized. She now drives 22 miles to Kokomo to work 10-hour days with a 4-day week, has client quotas, and makes 75% of what she made in 2004. She hates it.