Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Koch Industries has been lobbying to prevent the E.P.A. from classifying formaldehyde,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 12:29 PM
Original message
"Koch Industries has been lobbying to prevent the E.P.A. from classifying formaldehyde,
which the company produces in great quantities, as a “known carcinogen” in humans.

Scientists have long known that formaldehyde causes cancer in rats, and several major scientific studies have concluded that formaldehyde causes cancer in human beings—including one published last year by the National Cancer Institute, on whose advisory board Koch sits. The study tracked twenty-five thousand patients for an average of forty years; subjects exposed to higher amounts of formaldehyde had significantly higher rates of leukemia. These results helped lead an expert panel within the National Institutes of Health to conclude that formaldehyde should be categorized as a known carcinogen, and be strictly controlled by the government. Corporations have resisted regulations on formaldehyde for decades, however, and Koch Industries has been a large funder of members of Congress who have stymied the E.P.A., requiring it to defer new regulations until more studies are completed.

Koch Industries became a major producer of the chemical in 2005, after it bought Georgia-Pacific, the paper and wood-products company, for twenty-one billion dollars. Georgia-Pacific manufactures formaldehyde in its chemical division, and uses it to produce various wood products, such as plywood and laminates. Its annual production capacity for formaldehyde is 2.2 billion pounds. Last December, Traylor Champion, Georgia-Pacific’s vice-president of environmental affairs, sent a formal letter of protest to federal health authorities. He wrote that the company “strongly disagrees” with the N.I.H. panel’s conclusion that formaldehyde should be treated as a known human carcinogen. David Koch did not recuse himself from the National Cancer Advisory Board, or divest himself of company stock, while his company was directly lobbying the government to keep formaldehyde on the market. (A board spokesperson said that the issue of formaldehyde had not come up.)

James Huff, an associate director at the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences, a division of the N.I.H., told me that it was “disgusting” for Koch to be serving on the National Cancer Advisory Board: “It’s just not good for public health. Vested interests should not be on the board.” He went on, “Those boards are very important. They’re very influential as to whether N.C.I. goes into formaldehyde or not. Billions of dollars are involved in formaldehyde.”

Harold Varmus, the director of the National Cancer Institute, knows David Koch from Memorial Sloan-Kettering, which he used to run. He said that, at Sloan-Kettering, “a lot of people who gave to us had large business interests. The one thing we wouldn’t tolerate in our board members is tobacco.” When told of Koch Industries’ stance on formaldehyde, Varmus said that he was “surprised.”

Read more http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/08/30/100830fa_fact_mayer#ixzz1EzbpkNLn



It's buried way down in a long article about how the Koch brothers area cancer on the body politic. Turns out they may be behind some literal cancer as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's so sad that our "leaders" would ever be persuaded by lobbyists like that...
What a corrupt system we have!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. But but they gave money to high art and ballet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. OMG, They're on the National Cancer Advisory Board?
How the fuck did THAT happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. ... advising companies how to GIVE people cancer?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Well, I ws going to volunteer, but I didn't have any money to donate, so.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BanzaiBonnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Watch for discussions on health and safety issues
here on DU and pay attention when someone says, we have to wait for more studies on the issue.

Sock puppet operatives follow this dictate, to "defer new regulations until more studies are completed." They sound very reasonable and studied. Not making waves or sounding alarmist in any way. Only asking for reasonable action on our part. By implication, if we don't want to wait for more studies, we are being unreasonable. And because humans are genetically programmed to cooperate, we accede to be reasonable. Psy-ops at work.

We are going to be studied to death.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ah yes, formaldehyde - When I read that I thought of aspartame & Monsanto & Rumsfeld..........
http://whatdoesthesciencesay.wordpress.com/2010/06/13/aspartame-and-formaldehyde/

Aspartame and Formaldehyde (or not…)
Posted on June 13, 2010 by Josh DeWald

..In 1997 there was an increase in aspartame users reporting severe toxicity reactions and damage such as seizures, eye damage and vision loss, confusion, severe migraines, tremors, depression, anxiety attacks, insomnia, etc. In the same years, Ralph Walton, MD, Chairman, The Center for Behavioral Medicine showed that the only studies which didn’t find problems with aspartame where those funded by the manufacturer (Monsanto)....

While it is true that aspartame does break down into methanol then formaldehyde, it actually happens much more in fruit juices (about 2x in a banana, or 6x in an 8oz glass of tomato juice2).

...........

Even though in this case formaldehyde is not in the form of aspartame it still has the same story line just like when Rumsfeld pushed aspartame through. I still don't think we are told what aspartame can or does do to the human body. I was told by a nurse way back in 1984 never to use it because she had worked for one of the Dr's who did the initial testing of the product and he let it slip to tell everyone they knew NEVER to use it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC