Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ohio Schools Panel Rejects Union-Scale Wages

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 07:57 AM
Original message
Ohio Schools Panel Rejects Union-Scale Wages
Ohio Schools Panel Rejects Union-Scale Wages

COLUMBUS, Ohio -- Amid a fight over union rights in Ohio, the state panel that controls millions of dollars in school construction voted Thursday to no longer support union-scale wage requirements on job sites.

Tim Keen, the chairman of the Ohio School Facilities Commission, said the move was aimed at "making our scarce dollars for school construction go just as far as possible."

Keen, the governor's budget director who heads the seven-member commission, said he did not know how much the state could save from the move. Still, he said, "I think any time you take steps to limit the pool of bidders for projects, you are going to find that you are paying more than you otherwise would."

Two of the three voting members on the commission passed a resolution that says the panel will reject any bids that include a prevailing-wage requirement or the union-friendly project labor agreements.


http://www2.nbc4i.com/news/2011/feb/25/ohio-schools-panel-rejects-union-scale-wages-ar-406334/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Race to the bottom. Shitty construction and half-assed execution in our future...
'the panel will reject any bids that include a prevailing-wage requirement or the union-friendly project labor agreements.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. They can use the money they save to buy hard hats for the kids
to shield them from falling debris.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. To all my sparsely-employed friends who work in construction
your lives just got even more difficult. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NEOhiodemocrat Donating Member (624 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. That is terrible
"Two of the three voting members on the commission passed a resolution that says the panel will reject any bids that include a prevailing-wage requirement or the union-friendly project labor agreements." so I take it this means they refuse these bids even if they are lower? And they will deny this is a union killing measure?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. Won't be long and everyone will be working for scab labor scale
Becoming a nation of scabs.

Geebuz.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. As someone who used to run a school system warehouse and
requisitioned out supplies to people in maintenance, when the system decided to outsource that work to avoid paying for employees with benefits, it turned out to be more expensive. The money was going to their bosses. They will pay one way or the other and this is political, not budgeting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
8. There may be some federal and state issues with that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC