Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

### EPIC FAIL ### Obama will be UnElectable in Next Election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 03:34 PM
Original message
### EPIC FAIL ### Obama will be UnElectable in Next Election
Edited on Thu Feb-24-11 03:37 PM by FreakinDJ
If Obama can not support embattled working families against the RATpubliCON assault on Unions and living Wages he will be unelectable

Candidate Obama says, "Denied Right To Bargain, I'll Walk Picket Line With You"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5voSHCn6NE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. ROFL
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. You ain't lying, "Epic Fail." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bookmarking
See you in 2012!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. You did the same thing when I said ....
Nancy's Stimulus package was going to cost us the 2010 election

How is that working out for you ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. We kept the Senate and of course, the presidency
So I think we're just fine. The house can pass all the bullshit they want but none of it will become law. See how that works?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Only because not enough seats opened up in the Senate
I wouldn't be counting my chicks just yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Well, you just go ahead and promote failure
I shall do the opposite. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I'm actually advocating a Wake Up Call to Pres. Obama
he needs to say some thing

I think a very large majority of Americans understand wages and living standards are under attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Yeah, we all know you two are BFF's
And he hangs on your every word... :crazy:

You aren't saying this bullshit to Obama, you are saying it to Democrats. Who do you think you are influencing again?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mochajava666 Donating Member (771 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #28
49. Take it easy, Francis
Alerted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #49
59. Alerted for what?
Name calling? No, that's what you just did, genius.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-11 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #49
65. Any of you guys call me Francis, and I'll kill you.
"And I don't like nobody touching my stuff. So just keep your meat-hooks off. If I catch any of you guys in my stuff, I'll kill you. Also, I don't like nobody touching me. Now, any of you homos touch me, and I'll kill you. "


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadEyeDyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-11 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #18
67. You voted for Obama in 2010?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm not convinced. Perhaps if you added more inexplicable
Edited on Thu Feb-24-11 03:42 PM by sufrommich
capital letters in your next post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Obama will LOSE Pennsylvania!!!!"
So sayeth every know-nothing prognosticator up to and including late October 2008.

It's quite clear that some of the most vociferous predictors on the interwebs don't know fuck all about politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. As the RATpubliCONs play that video clip 1000s of times to let working class know
you can NOT depend on Obama

The Welfare vote alone ain't gonna get it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
36. The Union folks are in Philly and Pittsbugh ... and they will support Obama.
Having grown up in PA, and still having family and friends there now ... PA remains ... Philly to the East, Pittsburgh to the west, and ALABAMA in between.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Is this a parody of ODS, or the real thing?...


Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
63. come on Sid, bust it out!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. ******OBAMA SHOULD NOT STEP FOOT IN WISCONSIN RIGHT NOW*******
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. I was right about Nancy's Stimulus Pkg and I'm right about this
When you can pull your head out of the sand perhaps we can discuss it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
31. Ah, the last refuge of the Internet scoundrel in an argument.
Declare "victory", tell your opponent that they're stupid, and run away to the monkey bars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. I'm still waiting for a coherent reply from you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #35
44. To what, exactly?
All you've done is call Obama a poopyhead, stick out your tongue, and declare victory. What should my response be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. Only if he runs as a Democrat

IBTL

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. $^##%&EPIC FAIL)(*&_)( Misuse of hashmarks!
-50 points, too, for poor use of mixed capitalization. RATpubliCON?

:rofl:!!!11!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. You gonna clean up all those #s and *s when you're done with this thread, young man?
Don't make me tell your father.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. ### EPIC FAIL ### - This thread
Edited on Thu Feb-24-11 04:01 PM by LynneSin
Personally I think Obama has been cautious on this one since this is a state issue not federal. He has expressed his support of the unions but he's got his own country to run right now.

The fact that he supports repealing DOMA will probably get him re-elected in 2012. That and the fact that any real republican challenger will probably wait until 2016. I think we're going to see a bunch of Bob Doles this election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Champion Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. +1,000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
52. yea lynnesin, I think its the whole state thing
and not a federal thing, but what's happening in Wisconsin is going to spread to other states, so when it gets to that point, will the President support workers? or will he say the same thing like his press secretary said today, everyone has to tighten their belt, looks like the belt is getting tighter around our necks, not for the upper 1%. just my two cents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yep
he has touted the Republican corporate message

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Godhumor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
22. How would the Repubs use this video? To show that he supports the unions, to show that he doesn't?
Do you think Republicans are going to try to convince unions they will promote their rights? Do you think the republican base is going to be happy with that kind of message?

What if they show it to say that Obama stands with the evil unions--do you think that will make unions less likely to vote for Obama?

You seem certain this is going to damn Obama, but I am honestly unsure how you think how the opposition party would use this to convince unions to abandon Obama in favor of Republicans who are actively and vocally trying to end union power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. To show his campaign promises don't mean SHIT
I think Hilary said it better "We need more then a colorful speech"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Godhumor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. There is no crossover in the Venn diagram between the people Republicans want support from
And those they would try to gain by using a union message from the president.

"People who might be angry at the president for not more forcefully supporting the WI protests from 3 years ago, look at this video of him from 2007--why, he never joined a non-existent picket line! He lied to you! Vote for us, we, uh...well, actually we kind of hate you. I'm actually not sure what we'd offer you..."

This isn't how the Democrats and Republicans go about making ads. If anything, Republicans would use that to convince the populace that the president supports the union boogey-man, not that he didn't support them.

There is exactly one group that would use the video in the way that you suggest, which would be a fringe candidate from the left. Traditionally, they don't make any dent at all--especially with something as miniscule as a perceived (i.e. one that not everyone shares the same view on) broken campaign promise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. Yeah, he should totally abandon his job
to go walk the picket lines!

Oh, wait...he's the President of a nation of 300 million people and a political lightning rod and could never, ever, ever, ever do this.

This is about union workers fighting for their right to collective bargaining. He steps in, and it becomes Democrats vs. Republicans. Obama vs. Walker. "BIG GUMMINT" vs. "the little guy". Guess which side wins those arguments? Like, all the time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #23
40. I call PUMA alert.
Hillary is further right than Obama is.

And your need to throw in that non sequitur speaks volumes, not about Obama, but about the motivations behind this OP.

EPIC FAIL indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
25. If I had a nickel for every damned time
certain posters predicted the imminent collapse of the Obama Presidency based on whatever seems to piss them off that day I'd be fucking rich by now.

EPIC FAIL? shit dude at least pretend to use it properly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
26. I think you inadvertently described this whole thread there, Sparky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
29. I'll bet you $20 right now that he will be reelected.
Put your money where your mouth is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
32. Its fucking sad
Edited on Thu Feb-24-11 04:59 PM by Ramulux
Reading other people on this site trying to defend this shit. He specifically said he would go down to ground zero of any labor movement and now he refuses to even acknowledge what they are trying to do for fear he might get labeled a liberal. Hes a pathetic politician who doesn't give a shit about working people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. What are we defending?
The President's allowing the Wisconsin unions to keep ownership of this protest. Do you have any idea what happens if he injects himself into this discussion? Right now, the unions and labor are winning this battle. If he steps in, he would be doing Scott Walker a favor by providing him with a boogeyman--and we all know how good Republicans are at demonizing boogeymen.

Aside from public statements of support he needs to stay the fuck out of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Politico and Rawstory have already reported on his silence
and No. I don't think it is appropriate for Obama to go down to Ground Zero and pick up a picket sign. How ever a few words to define (Frame) the argumentas about being RIGHTS of the Working Class would go a long way to defuse the Right-Wing's lie it is about Debt/Taxes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. WAPO ... Obama joins Wisconsin's budget battle, opposing Republican anti-union bill
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/17/AR2011021705494.html?hpid=topnews&sid=ST2011021705923

So much for his "silence" ...

Apparently, if Obama doesn't call in an air strike, he has been "silent".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #34
45. Which he has already done.
He called the governor's bill an assault on unions and their right to collective bargaining.

Not my fault you can't do a simple Google search.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
37. Yes, union folks will vote for ROMNEY or PALIN!!!!!
Talk about EPIC FAIL.

Look, if you you are sooooo smart ... simply tell us which right winger WINS in 2012.

Should be easy.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #37
46. There were union folks who voted for Ronald Freakin' Reagan in 1984
even after he had fired the PATCO workers 3 years earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #46
54. Apparently you think today's Union folks are (a) stupid, and (b)
ignorant of that history.

Again ... NAME the GOP candidate that today's Union folks will back ....

Oh wait ... YOU CAN'T .... there isn't one.

Or if there was ... you would NAME THAT PERSON.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. Do you honestly believe that all union people vote in unison
Edited on Thu Feb-24-11 10:08 PM by Art_from_Ark
and that they will always vote for the Democrat? That is naive thinking at best. Look at heavily unionized states in this country-- Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, New Jersey-- they ALL have Republican governors! And most have Republican legislatures as well! Why is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #56
60. Clearly because the GOP supports Unions more .... or ...
and try to follow me here ... even those states have less than a majority of union voters.

I grew up in PA ... the union areas are generally in PA and Pittsburgh. The middle of the state is rural and less unionized.
The unionized parts of the state vote DEM, the rural areas in the middle generally do not.

But my point, that you continue to avoid, is that UNION voters are not supporting the GOP. And there is no GOP candidate that will do anything to attract them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-11 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #60
64. I was around a lot of union types in the '80s
Basically, they were Archie Bunker types. They loved Reagan. They hated Carter because "he was a wimp". They hated Mondale because he was "going to raise taxes". They hated Dukakis because he looked like a doofus riding in the tank. Hell, McCain got 30% of the union vote in 2008.

http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/4035/obama_and_the_union_vote/

So really, you can't count on the union vote as being monolithic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-11 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #64
66. Agree they are not monolythic ... and sure, in the past they have been
vulnerable to the kind of nationalistic bravado of Reagan and they could identify with "strength" ... and even today, you are going to lose some due to social issues (some of the Catholic Union guys I've known forever can end up there).

McCain getting 30% I think is inflated because some of the union folks I've known, and still know, saw him as a moderate. They remembered the old McCain.

In the group of GOP candidates for 2012 ... I don't see a Reagan or a McCain. In fact, pretty much every GOP Presidential hopefully as been openly hostile to Unions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
39. ###EPIC SQUIRREL FAIL###
Edited on Thu Feb-24-11 06:05 PM by AtomicKitten
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
41. Wow. Only the 332nd time this clip has been posted today. The message has gotten out, huh?
And the use of the outdated phrase "Epic Fail" is surprisingly fitting with this OP...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeunderdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
42. Why would the Repukes run anyone against him?
he's making the party proud and rewarding big business and billionaires for all their hard work.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
43. I was skeptical of your point at first, but your use of pound signs convinced me you're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #43
58. Well played, sir...
well played indeed. :thumbsup:

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
47. Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
48. Well, he TALKS a big talk at least. I'll give him that.
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mochajava666 Donating Member (771 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
50. Time to put on those comfortable shoes
He said in 2007 that he would join the picket lines if the right to collectively bargain was threatened.

Does he have any accountability?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
51. K & R !!!
Apparently The PPT is on duty tonight.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. What is "PPT"?
Something nefarious?

People Paying Tolls?
Party Pants Turks?
Pom Pom Tutus?
Pretty Pink Turtles?
Putrid Panty Treat?
Poop Poop Turd?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. Post Petty Tripe?
Really. What is PPT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
57. Un-recced for you wasting Skinner's bandwidth with this post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
61. If it wasn't for the witty responses
I would have considered this thread an epic fail.

As it stands, I'll just unrec for the op being such an unnecessary eeyore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
62. bless your little heart for campaigning against obama so hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC