okay, not her exact words. But that is the spirit of what she was saying in this interview. I keep going back and reading that paragraph over and over. It is so presumptuous.
This is really a puff piece type of interview by Mother Jones. The reporter gets some well-deserved hits in the comments, btw, from some important educators. To her credit she promises a follow-up.
Wendy Kopp's Lesson Plan for AmericaIt's bothersome that the reporter's comments leading into the interview appear to accept Wendy Kopp as the end authority of education. Amazing how that happens when you get all the media on your side.
Kopp's lessons are drawn from Teach for America, which this year sent 8,200 new college graduates to teach in high-need schools across the US. Those 8,200 teachers may be a drop in the national teachers' bucket of 3.7 million, but they're still part of a bigger TFA corps than ever before, especially in Arkansas and Mississippi. And many TFA alums will continue to teach after their two-year paid fellowship ends. Some may even become power players in education reform, following in the footsteps of DC's Michelle Rhee and the founders of the successful charter school networks KIPP and Uncommon Schools.
Notice how KIPP is prominent in the interview. Easy to explain. Wendy Kopp is married to the founder of the KIPP Charter schools. They are considered one of America's power couples.
Marcello Stroud sent me TFA’s 990 for fiscal 2008. It shows that TFA had revenues of $159 million in fiscal year 2008 and expenses of $124.5 million. CEO and founder Wendy Kopp made $265,585, with an additional $17,027 in benefits and deferred compensation. She also made an additional $71,021 in compensation and benefits through the TFA-related organization Teach for All. Seven other TFA staffers are listed as making more than $200,000 in pay and benefits, with another four approaching that amount.
It’s also interesting to look at the 990 for the KIPP Foundation, the charter school chain led by Richard Barth, a former Edison vice president and TFA staffer who also happens to be Kopp’s husband. Barth made more than $300,000 in pay and benefits, bringing the Kopp/Barth household income to almost $600,000 for their work with TFA and KIPP. (In a 2008 article, the New York Times dubbed Kopp and Barth as “a power couple in the world of education, emblematic of a new class of young social entrepreneurs seeking to reshape the United States’ educational landscape.”) TFA replacing higher-salaried, experienced teachers?Back to the Mother Jones interview and the part that caught my attention.
MJ: You've been following education reform for the past two decades. How has it changed? What do you think of its tone now?
WK: The biggest positive change in the conversation is that we've moved away from the assumption that in order to fix education in low-income communities, we have to first fix poverty. Today, we know that we don't have to wait for that. We know that we can provide kids with an education that sets them up to succeed. That's a huge change.
She makes another comment that really upsets me. It is a common saying among reformers that until TFA came along it was assumed that poverty kept one from learning. I would love to find out who started that, because it is just another made-up talking point. Of course kids in poverty can learn, of course. But that does not mean it does not have to be fixed!
MJ: Was Waiting for Superman good or bad for education reform?
WK: Most importantly, Waiting for Superman showed that kids and parents in low-income communities desperately want a quality education. It's stunning to think that two or three years ago, people just assumed that kids in low-income communities don't succeed because their parents don't care. We at TFA know through our firsthand experience that nothing can be further from the truth. When kids are met with the highest expectations and given the extra supports they need, they can be as motivated as kids anywhere.
It infuriates me that she would say that. It is so untrue. It is a statement geared to make public education look bad and TFA look good. It shows they have no scruples about attacking any way they can.
TFAers should not think of themselves as heroes coming in to save the day.
So I really do hope that Mother Jones with its purported liberal reputation will follow through on setting it straight about such a one-sided interview.
The TFA 20th anniversary conference is going on today. Here are some
interesting comments from Norm at Ednotes who is blogging the meeting. Just picking a few.
Joel Klein's words are a hoot.
*Klein is speaking now. “Is this our Egypt moment? Will we seize the moment? We will talk to each other and go home. I challenge this group to seize the moment. We no longer believe that poverty is permanent…Education…this is America’s issue. What will change it? Each one of you must insist that each school out there is one that you would send your kids too.” He takes it to a new level. He says “transformational change” isn’t enough—we need “radical change.” More empty statements from the former chancellor.
Words with little meaning.
Next, Michelle Rhee, who is now trying to fire 8% of all Florida's teachers.
Rhee: “ I have not demonized the teachers union. I have been trying to show people that the teachers unions are doing exactly what they are supposed to do.” What planet does she live on? Maybe it’s not really her? Nope, it is. We’ve just moved into the part of the session in which all the speakers are going to contradict themselves
She is plugging Students First, her new organization now, as the solution to the teachers union.
Then John Deasy, head of the Los Angeles schools.
John Deasey. “This is an issue around courage. We have the skill. How courageous are we going to be? What if 11,000 people descended on LA to demand change.” Hmmm, didn’t LA teachers recently take to the streets to demand what they wanted? Maybe their message isn’t what he wants to hear.
He is now talking about how he needs people to come to LA and work?
I think a column from the Oklahoma Daily blog put the whole thing in perspective last year.
Teach for America not as good an idea as some graduates believeThose who are thinking of participating in Teach for America with a social justice mission in mind should consider this. Although a far more daunting task for sure, those really interested in social justice should consider ways of solving problems like unavoidable unemployment and low-wage jobs.
On top of failing to make a dent in poverty, Teach for America actually detracts from social justice by hurting real teachers. Teach for America students take low, entrance-level pay while also receiving a government subsidy for their salary in the form of Americorps stipends. Schools lay off teachers and then hire Teach for America teachers to fill positions that real teachers would otherwise be filling. Teach for America teachers are undercutting the wage needs of real teachers and causing them to be laid off as a result.
Imagine this: a well-off college student takes a subsidized teaching position at an impossibly low wage and displaces actual teachers who might already be struggling to get by — all for social justice!
For anyone who has any concern for labor rights, this is extremely abusive. Not undercutting wage demands of often unionized workers is rule number one of how to be a serious social justice advocate.
Amen to that. Yes, Wendy Kopp. We do still need to worry about poverty. TFA is not a solution to problems that haunt our country right now.