Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jack Goldsmith in WaPo: Why The U.S. Shouldn't Try Julian Assange

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-11 01:23 AM
Original message
Jack Goldsmith in WaPo: Why The U.S. Shouldn't Try Julian Assange
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/10/AR2011021006324.html

Why The U.S. Shouldn't Try Julian Assange

The first problem with going after Assange is that the effort is likely to fail. Extraditing Assange from England (where he is now) or Sweden (where he may go to face charges of sexual assault) would not be easy, especially since Assange's actions might be deemed a "political offense," for which exceptions are made to extradition obligations.

Even if the U.S. government surmounts this hurdle, a criminal conviction is not assured. The most relevant law, the Espionage Act, is famously overbroad and thus an uncertain basis for prosecution. This is one reason the government has never successfully prosecuted a member of the media for soliciting or publishing classified information. Nor has the government ever successfully prosecuted a non-media organization for solicitation or receipt of classified information.

A failed attempt to prosecute Assange would be worse than not prosecuting him. It would make the United States look even more ineffectual than it does as a result of the leaks.

A successful prosecution, on the other hand, would not achieve the desired deterrent effect. WikiLeaks copycats are quickly proliferating around the globe, beyond the U.S. government's effective reach. A conviction would make a martyr of Assange, embolden copycat efforts and illustrate the limits of American law to stop them.

MORE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-11 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. If a US national received secret documents of the Chinese government and published them
would the US honor a request from the government in Beijing for his arrest and extradition? How about if the case involved documents of the government of Iran? Or Burma? Or Algeria? We would laugh that off and say there is no crime to arrest for, secrets are not property, and the other country should have done a better job keeping its secrets.

The notion that the US government would try Julian Assange, a non-US national for releasing copies of US State Dept. and DoD documents, insisting that OTHER countries help them, is absurd, and frankly it's the behavior of a tyrant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-11 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC