Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LePage’s (Maine Rep. Gov.) opposition to chemicals law draws criticism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 08:35 AM
Original message
LePage’s (Maine Rep. Gov.) opposition to chemicals law draws criticism
http://new.bangordailynews.com/2011/02/04/politics/458614/

AUGUSTA, Maine — It seemed like an issue upon which everyone could agree: protecting children from harmful chemicals in the products they use every day.

Yet less than three years after the “Kid-Safe Products Act” passed the Legislature with overwhelming bipartisan support, the law has re-emerged as a political issue and a potential flash point in the coming debate over Gov. Paul LePage’s regulatory reform agenda.

Environmental and public health groups accuse LePage of putting the interests of chemical companies and toy manufacturers ahead of children by targeting a proposed ban on the use of bisphenol-A, or BPA, in children’s sippy cups and other consumer products sold in Maine.

“It runs afoul of common sense and it exposes the governor’s hypocrisy,” said Mike Belliveau, executive director of the Environmental Health Strategy Center. “He is supposed to be for the little guy, and here he is representing the big companies from out of state.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. LePage is a typical republic - he wants environmental regulations to be based on "sound science"
but when the science doesn't square with his ideology (or his cronies wishes) he ignores them.

Bisphenol-A

Global warming

Vernal pools

you name it.

and like all moran teabaggers, he wears his ignorance like a badge of honor.

yup


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I have a question
How is it that no one ever realized that there were so many pro-corporate, bigoted, mysoginistic voters in Maine, until now?

I don't live there, have enough asshats here in Virginia, and they gave us Crazy Ken and his Band of Bigots.

And mostly because a black man was elected to serve as President!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. split vote...3 candidates last election
he was elected with 38% of the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. LePage won with only 38% of the vote in a multi-candidate field
Edited on Sun Feb-06-11 09:05 AM by jpak
and the anonymous posters in the comments sections of Maine papers are paid operatives of the Maine Heritage Foundation that live in their mommy's basements.

They are not the majority in Maine - not by a long shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. Last night my brother called me from his home in Portland, Maine.
He's beside himself over LePage. The guy is a grade A nut. He (my brother) blames the Democrat in the primary on LePage's win. He said there was a fairly strong (and decent) Independent candidate and a weak Democratic candidate. Apparently a relative or associate of the Dem candidate undertook a smear campaign which was all untrue about the Indie candidate. He said the Indie candidate almost won despite the smears, but the nut edged him out. Too bad. Maine is a great state and this character is going to do a lot of harm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. the indie was also a former democrat.(Cutler)
and the democrat (Mitchell) should have dropped out. It was a pretty tight race in the end, I thought Cutler was going to make it, but LePage squeaked through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I voed for Libby absentee, but wished I could have that one back
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crystal Clarity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. The smear campaign came from a loser of the Dem primary.
Not the winner of the Dem primary herself (aka Libby Mitchell, the Dem candidate for the general election). The smear campaign came from a woman by the name of Rosa Scarecelli who had lost the Dem primary to Mitchell.

BTW, Mitchell was NOT "a weak candidate"... Her credentials were impeccable. Unfortunately, the very thing that made her an excellent candidate (years of political experience in Maine politics) worked against her due to the 2010 election's emphasis against "career politicians". Sad, because in nearly any other year, her amazing record would have been a strong point, not a detriment.

I ended up voting for the independent because for me, it came down to 'anyone but LePage', but he wasn't my first choice by a long shot. IMO we had an excellent Dem. candidate for Gov. but it just wasn't her year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Thanks for more info. My brother isn't the political junkie that I am
so I'm not surprised he didn't get the story right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Mitchell should have dropped out.
Edited on Sun Feb-06-11 11:07 AM by northernlights
She had no chance to win and ended up being the spoiler. I blame her and the die-hard, party line voters who left us with this disaster of a teabaggovernor.

I was going to vote for Mitchell, in spite of her horrible tv ads, which really turned me off. But I held out to see who had the best shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeeYiYi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. The man's name is synonymous with mucilage...


TYY :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. He's also synonymous with ignorant anti-environment dumbfuckery
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC