Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

USDA makes Roundup Ready sugar beet decision

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 11:18 AM
Original message
USDA makes Roundup Ready sugar beet decision
USDA makes Roundup Ready sugar beet decision
Published on Friday, February 4, 2011 12:41 PM MST

Montana's senior U.S. Sen. Max Baucus announced Friday a decision by the USDA that will clear the way for Montana sugar beet farmers to move forward with planting this year. Baucus has been urging U.S. Agriculture Secretary Vilsack for a resolution to the issues because Montana farmers have been in limbo waiting for an administrative decision regarding Roundup Ready sugar beets for the 2011 crop year.

On Friday, the USDA announced it will partially deregulate Roundup Ready sugar beet root crops, which affects almost 100 percent of the nearly 31,000 sugar beet acres grown in Montana.

“This news means Montana sugar beet farmers have the certainty they need to move forward. It’s important that the USDA complete its study, but our producers were being unfairly asked to wait in limbo as the planting season quickly approaches,” said Baucus, a senior member of the Senate Agriculture Committee. “Agriculture is the backbone of our economy and Montana jobs depend on our ability to go to bat for our producers and resolve these issues before it’s time for planting.”

Last week, Baucus wrote a letter to Vilsack urging him to quickly deregulate Roundup Ready sugar beets and allow producers to move forward with planting while the USDA completes an Environmental Impact Statement, which is currently underway and expected to be completed by June 2012.

http://www.sidneyherald.com/articles/2011/02/05/news/breaking_news/doc4d4c56734585c578636921.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. If GM crops scare you, this is huge.
To everyone else, it's just another bureaucratic decision in a sea of daily bureaucratic decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daggahead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. A giveaway to Monsanto ... thanks USDA. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. fuck, fuck, fuck. Last week it was roundup ready alfalfa
By BILL TOMSON And SCOTT KILMAN

January 27, 2011

http://online.wsj.com

WASHINGTON—The Obama administration Thursday abandoned a proposal to restrict planting of genetically engineered alfalfa, the latest rule-making proposal shelved as part of the administration's review of "burdensome" regulation.

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack's decision not to regulate alfalfa genetically modified to survive applications of the Monsanto Co. herbicide Roundup is a victory for the big seed and agri-chemicals company and the American Farm Bureau Federation, which represents farmers, who had opposed the proposed curbs that were proposed about a month ago.

The Obama administration said earlier this month it is reviewing all proposed government regulation to weed out proposals that are overly burdensome to businesses—part of a broader effort to repair relations with employers and industry. The administration has also shelved two proposed workplace-safety rules opposed by business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. "to weed out proposals that are overly burdensome to businesses"
got it??

"The administration has also shelved two proposed workplace-safety rules opposed by business."

got that, too?

I do not see how anyone can miss the message of this administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. the message is that the admin supports agribusiness
and is willing to run roughshod over anything or anyone that gets in their way. disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. I never understood why the decision isn't jointly made by the USDA and the EPA.
The high concentrations of Round-Up pesticide coupled with the misconfiguration organically of the plant is environmental and can't be trusted to the Agriculture Department.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prairierose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Because tradition ally, this has been a USDA area...
and no one has suggested that EPA should be let in on the fun. But the truth is, it probably would not matter since the herbicides used are approved. They just use much more with these frankencrops. Isn't that how you save money for the farmers? Oh wait, I forgot, most of the farmers left are agribusiness corps and they get subsidies from Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. ore reasonamerica is dying.
C&H pure CANE sugar!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC