Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Insane Walmart policy allows UMich Innocence Project to prove killer didn't do it

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 05:00 PM
Original message
Insane Walmart policy allows UMich Innocence Project to prove killer didn't do it
http://www.freep.com/article/20110203/NEWS06/102030499/U-M-law-clinic-Records-prove-convicted-killer-Mark-Craighead-innocent-after-all?odyssey=mod|newswell|text|FRONTPAGE|p

U-M law clinic:
Records prove
convicted killer
Mark Craighead is
innocent after all

1:18 AM, Feb. 3, 2011
By DAVID ASHENFELTER
Detroit Free Press Staff Writer

Detroit homicide detectives were waiting
for Mark Craighead when he got home
from work and errands in June 2000.

They wanted to question him about the 3-
year-old slaying of his best friend, Chole
Pruett.

Craighead said he asked whether he could
call a lawyer.

They refused, and he reluctantly went with
them.

During the next 17 hours, he said, the cops
squeezed him to admit to killing Pruett. He
wound up signing a vaguely worded
confession that undercut his claim that he
was locked inside a Sam's Club in
Farmington Hills, working the midnight shift
the night Pruett was killed.

A jury convicted him of manslaughter, and
he spent seven years in prison.

Today, law students at the University of
Michigan's Innocence Clinic are battling in
court to exonerate Craighead after finding
Sam's Club phone records that, they say,
prove his innocence.

-snip-

A Sam's Club supervisor testified that
Craighead typically worked the midnight
shift, when the crew was locked inside the
store to prevent theft -- then a store
policy. But the boss couldn't remember
whether Craighead had worked that
particular night.

-snip-

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Th1onein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Insane" Walmart policy? Huh?
How is keeping phone records insane? Those records prove this man's innocence. He's already served his time and is out of prison. Do you really think a guilty man, already out of prison, would be asking for a new trial to prove his innocence? He has a lot at stake: his freedom.

I don't get the title of your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The "insane" policy isn't keeping phone records
It's that Walmart was locking employees into the stores overnight to keep them from stealing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think "Insane" is referring to the policy of locking workers in the building overnight,
not the keeping of phone records.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lmarcotty Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Locking employees in is the insane policy, I think
Phone records, good policy - locking your employees into the building so they can't leave, not so much. Reminiscent of the Triangle Shirt Factory disaster, you know? I think Th1onein agrees with you on the righteousness of the defendant's cause, but was remarking on the irony that the bizarre Walmart employment practice of locking employees in might constitute the evidence necessary to overturn the guy's conviction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Other stores lock workers in. It happened to my son about 15
years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Wal*Mart's insanity was locking up its employees. The guy was a convict before he was wrongly
convicted.

A hard-time prisoner of Sam's Club.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
May Hamm Donating Member (244 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I didn't get it either...


It didn't make any sense to me as written but luckily more responses have come in since then and clarified it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC