Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is it a fair analogy to say if the govt. can force military service, then why can't

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Hawaii Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 08:14 AM
Original message
Is it a fair analogy to say if the govt. can force military service, then why can't
it make people buy health insurance?..Or is it apples to oranges?..

Yes, there's no draft but 18 year olds still are required to register for the Selective Service...I'm sure there were plenty of people who objected to the Vietnam War who ended up in Southeast Asia...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Possumpoint Donating Member (937 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Faulty Logic
When the draft existed, only 18 year old and older males were involved. A somewhat narrow segment of society. The question is can the Federal Government require everyone to have or buy health insurance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. Completely bizarre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alc Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. depends on your interpretation of the commerce clause
Actually it will depend on the SC's interpretation.

The Constitution gives the federal government the power to "raise and support Armies" and "To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers". So forcing military service seems be be a power given to the feds.

The commerce clause says " To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes"

The 10th amendment says "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

If the commerce clause can be used to force purchase of a private product, then the 10th amendment gives the federal gov't the power to require purchase of health care. If not, that power is reserved for states since it is not prohibited (e.g. car insurance is required by states).

Or you can go with Hamilton's opinion (and others) that the general welfare clause supercedes everything else and there are no limits to federal power. That opinion scares me in general so I'd rather have a different connection to the Constitution for any laws passed. I'm not willing to pick and choose which laws are "good enough" to use the "general welfare clause" approach because I don't trust DC to be very smart in determining "good enough" (e.g. could be use for "the patriot act" and worse)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. "Hamilton's opinion," as in Alexander? Worthless. Only Right-Wingers try to use letters, essays,
etc., other than the CONSTITUTION to argue legal points with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alc Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yes, Alexander
He used the general welfare clause when he argued to the president then congress (not just letters, essays) that his banking bills were constitutional. His letters suggest he had a backup argument that could tie the banking bills to the enumerated powers but wanted to set the precedent that the general welfare clause allows anything. The clause is part of the Constitution, so a broad interpretation allows almost anything to be constitutional.

A lot of people on the left supporting health care reform seem to be happy arguing that general welfare is a good enough basis. I don't think it's a left/right thing. It's an "if I agree with your bill you can use 'general welfare' argument and if not you can't" thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. There they can use Congress' power to raise armies
Though it does not say anyone can be forced into it - there may be case law on that as someone likely challenged it in the Vietnam era.

The HCR would have to be valid under a different power, most likely the commerce clause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. Enumerated powers. Do schools not cover the Constitution/federalism anymore?
Edited on Thu Feb-03-11 09:43 AM by Statistical
The never ending false analogies (no offense OP you are just number 100 in a long line of failed analogies).

The Constitution defines what the federal government can do. It is a LIMITING DOCUMENT. The States pre-existed the federal government and fearing tyranny them specifically limited what the federal govt can do.


Everything in the world can be broken into three categories:
* Delegated Powers (also called Enumerated Powers) - Powers defined by the Constitution as delegated to the federal government.
* Prohibited Powers - Powers that are completely prohibited by the government (warrantless searches, banning firearms, state run media, etc)
* Reserved Powers - EVERYTHING ELSE is reserved by the States & the People.

The Constitution defines what the Federal govt can do via Delegated/Enumerated Powers. It also defines something which are completely off limits. EVERYTHING ELSE belongs to the States & People.

Just because Congress can do X doesn't mean it can do Y. The delegated power to raise an Army and provide for national defense hardly grants the Congress power to mandate citizens buy goods & services from third parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC