|
Actually it will depend on the SC's interpretation.
The Constitution gives the federal government the power to "raise and support Armies" and "To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers". So forcing military service seems be be a power given to the feds.
The commerce clause says " To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes"
The 10th amendment says "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
If the commerce clause can be used to force purchase of a private product, then the 10th amendment gives the federal gov't the power to require purchase of health care. If not, that power is reserved for states since it is not prohibited (e.g. car insurance is required by states).
Or you can go with Hamilton's opinion (and others) that the general welfare clause supercedes everything else and there are no limits to federal power. That opinion scares me in general so I'd rather have a different connection to the Constitution for any laws passed. I'm not willing to pick and choose which laws are "good enough" to use the "general welfare clause" approach because I don't trust DC to be very smart in determining "good enough" (e.g. could be use for "the patriot act" and worse)
|