http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2011/02/01/the-democracy-promotion-fetish/and one thing the egyptian and tunisian revolutions do is bring us back around to the neoconservatives again --
the title of the article:
The Democracy Promotion Fetish
and this from his comments section
'Over the last twenty years, the push for democracy promotion and the perpetuation of U.S. hegemony have gone hand in hand. It isn’t an accident that many of the most ideological supporters of so-called “benevolent global hegemony” are also sympathizing with the fall of Mubarak. Embracing regime change in Egypt in the hope that it will contribute to the weakening of U.S. hegemony, as some people seem to want t do, seem not to notice that many of the hegemonists are mostly content with what is happening. Indeed, the emergence of an Egyptian government that is actively opposed to the U.S. is useful to them, as it gives them another threat to over-hype and vilify. If someone could persuade me that political change in Egypt could affect U.S. policies overseas for the better, I might at least see the potential virtues of it, but I haven’t heard anything that persuades me yet.'
there are conservatives who are anti-empire -- and who can provide an interesting insight
as to how they think.
we have established quite a long history with this american empire business -- unraveling ourselves from it will be tricky --
and given the neoconservative urge to promote hysteria -- it's going to be interesting.
my feeling is that if a government is elected -- it's not up to us to like ot or not.
it's up to our government to DEAL with it.
even entities like hamas -- they were elected -- DEAL with them and stop thwarting the people.
oh and mind our own business to boot.