Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Isolationism (per wiki definition) - Good, bad, or indifferent?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 10:31 AM
Original message
Poll question: Isolationism (per wiki definition) - Good, bad, or indifferent?
Isolationism is a foreign policy adopted by a nation in which the country refuses to enter into any alliances, foreign trade or economic commitments, or international agreements, in hopes of focusing all of its resources into advancement within its own borders while remaining at peace with foreign countries by avoiding all entanglements of foreign agreements. In other words, it asserts both of the following:

Non-interventionism – Political rulers should avoid entangling alliances with other nations and avoid all wars not related to direct territorial self-defense.
Protectionism – There should be legal barriers to control trade and cultural exchange with people in other states.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isolationism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's the 21st century - isolation would be foolish
North Korea is isolated. And in poverty.

Other nations would still get together. Leaving the isolated out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. I support it as defined. We don't need no stinkin, confining treaties n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sure, let's pretend all is equal in terms of wealth, wages, currency values, environmental laws, etc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Is that an "It may have gotten a bad rap. I support it as defined."
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. No, it's "I'm tired of your constant spamming for globalization".
Look, it's not like the PTB aren't on your side. The President himself was talking your precious free trade up big time at the SOTU last night. Just stop trying to sell the swill to us. We have eyes that can see the jobs going away and communities destroyed across the country.

Plus, you're okay with sweatshops. Which pretty much invalidates anything you have to say on the topic as far as I'm concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I don't see posting a neutrally-worded (I hope) poll as spamming anything.
I thought the definition of isolationism that wiki provided was a fair representation of the beliefs of lots of DU'ers and the answers were not "loaded". Perhaps I should post a neutrally-worded (I hope) poll on globalization and see how that turns out. (I doubt either of us would be surprised at the result in that kind of poll.) ;)

I'm glad that, AFAIK, President Obama and I agree on this and don't really see the need to curtail any expressions of my support for his position just because he is now a PTB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Populist_Prole Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. Maybe a little extreme via engaging other governments but I'll basically agree
As for me.

Protectionism = Good

Economic Nationalism = Good

If it means imports will cost more: Good. It should be considered a tax of on those that eventually undermine the economy.

There. I said it. 'Cause sometimes hard extreme action, while not the intended result, is necessary to break through the inertia of the status quo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC