|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-17-10 04:38 AM Original message |
Why wasn't an Amendment required to prohibit the sale/possession/use of cannabis, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-17-10 04:45 AM Response to Original message |
1. a roundabout prohibition? you can legally buy, sell, grow pot you just have to have the stamp |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-17-10 04:49 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Fair enough. What are the requirements for obtaining a Marihuana Tax Stamp? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-17-10 04:47 AM Response to Original message |
2. The commerce clause of the Constitution is what is used to prohibit cannabis.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-17-10 04:54 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I just did some Googling on that particular interpretation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-17-10 09:11 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. It goes far beyond just marijuana too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-17-10 04:58 AM Response to Original message |
5. Because Some Citizens Have More Constitional Rights Than Others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-17-10 05:00 AM Response to Original message |
6. Maybe they used an Amendment to make sure it would apply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NWHarkness (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-17-10 07:39 AM Response to Original message |
7. An Amendment was not required for Prohibition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-17-10 07:43 AM Response to Original message |
8. It wasn't *required*. Using the Constitution for alcohol laws was an abuse of the Constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-17-10 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
9. Simple the constitution actually meant something at one time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 07:10 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC