|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Bill219 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 02:14 PM Original message |
How Keith Olbermann Will Save CNN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
1. That makes sense..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
2. IMO that would be great! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
3. "...neutral news brand they have been crafting." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hvn_nbr_2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 02:42 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. I don't see "the most trusted name in Faux imitators" hiring Keith. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 02:50 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Yeah, I caught that one, too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 03:59 PM Response to Reply #3 |
21. emphasis on "brand" and "crafting" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
4. I don't want to give credit to Rupert for anythin but a move like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frustratedlady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
6. I haven't watched CNN for a couple years. That will be interesting...if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
7. Now that would indeed be something. CNN could use a makeover big time. C'mon Ted, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 03:08 PM Response to Reply #7 |
17. Unfortunately Ted Turner left in 2006. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Parker CA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
8. Bring on KO and follow him up with Shuster, and CNN will have a giant leap in viewership. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
9. Here's another paragraph from the article that sounds promising: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 02:53 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Wow crossing my fingers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roselma (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
11. I don't know if CNN would even look at |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 05:56 PM Response to Reply #11 |
25. Wouldn't split the audience, because both channels do repeats we could watch both. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
12. Won't happen, CNNs new boss is a RWing extremist like Murdoch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firehorse (547 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
14. neutral news went out the window the day FAUX beat the FCC when they won |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
15. Not too long ago I watched CNN's (CEO? Pres?) being interviewed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
regnaD kciN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
16. I have my doubts... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 03:11 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. The most important thing to CNN is ratings. The higher the ratings, the more they can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
19. CNN would do it. Not sure KO would do it though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidwparker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 05:48 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. It is all about how the contract is written. Things like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monmouth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
20. I wonder how Anderson would deal with that competition. He seems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 05:55 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. He'd hold his breath, turn blue..start breathing again & get over it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 06:45 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. He would welcome it, IMHO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
23. CNN is almost as bad as FUX Noise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bleever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
26. "I can also imagine that MSNBC viewers won’t be breaking their Keith at 8, Rachel at 9 habit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
egressingsparrowdrop (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
28. Didn't he sign away his right to appear on another network? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC