Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge: administration engaging in illegitimate exercise of executive power in Guantanamo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-12 05:06 AM
Original message
Judge: administration engaging in illegitimate exercise of executive power in Guantanamo
Edited on Sun Dec-16-12 05:10 AM by No Elephants
The administration appealed, but then dropped the appeal.

U.S. drops appeal of Guantanamo ruling

Published: Dec. 15, 2012 at 9:22 PM

WASHINGTON, Dec. 15 (UPI) -- <snip>

The department filed a motion Friday asking the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia for permission to withdraw its appeal, Politico reported. The courts generally grant such requests.

U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth ruled against the Obama administration, which wanted the power to set rules for lawyers for Guantanamo inmates who have not been formally charged and are not currently seeking release. Lamberth said the administration was engaged in "an illegitimate exercise of executive power."

<snip>

During his 2008 presidential campaign, Obama had promised to take a different approach to Guantanamo and the detainees held there.


Okay, supposedly, Congress would not let him close Gitmo, but Congress has not been stopping him from running Gitmo lawfully.

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2012/12/15/US-drops-appeal-of-Guantanamo-ruling/UPI-68851355624532/?spt=hs&or=tn




In 2007-2008, I was so elated that a Constitutional lawyer was running, given how Bush had shredded the Constitution (with the help of Congress).

How young and naive I was! How much I have aged in only a few years!



Refresh | +2 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-12 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. We expected big change.
Didn't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-12 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. To be fair, some things changed for the worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-12 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. True. And that is hard to fathom.
One has to completely reorganize their way of thinking to wrap the mind around it.

I have some theories on this. But I chose to keep them to myself. Mostly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-12 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. There hasn't been a Democratic President since Jimmy Carter
and the 'Boys' fucked him royally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-12 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I don't know enough about Carter's administration, but what I do know makes me think that
Edited on Mon Dec-17-12 08:01 AM by No Elephants
he was underrated.

For one thing, while it took a long time, he did get every one of those hostages back alive without starting a war.

Everyone seems to focus on how long it took, but wars take years as well, along with lots of blood and treasure. I focus on the absence of a war.

And then there was his attempt to wean us off fossil fuels, especially foreign oil.

Too bad the Department of Energy that he created to fulbill that purpose went the way of most government agencies, namely to aid the job creating companies who love our dependence on fossil fuels.

And I admire his post-presidency, including the Jimmy Carter Center at Emory University.

Some Democrats say that he was too conservative.

I'd take him in a heartbeat over any Democrat I know of in office today, though.

At least, he was not anti-poor.

Speaking of which, I wonder what the U.S. would be like today if Robert Kennedy had not been assassinated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC