Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge Gets Probation for Felony Bribery (campaign $$ in exchange for rulings from the bench)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 09:54 AM
Original message
Judge Gets Probation for Felony Bribery (campaign $$ in exchange for rulings from the bench)
Judge Gets Probation for Felony Bribery


McKINNEY, Texas (CN) - A jury convicted a state judge of felony bribery, and Susan Wooten on Monday agreed to serve 10 years of probation, resign from the bench and waive her right to appeal.

Wooten was accused last year of taking bribes to fund her 2008 election campaign in exchange for rulings from the bench.

Under an agreement announced outside the jury's presence, Wooten, 43, acknowledged the jury's guilty verdicts on six bribery counts and one each of money laundering, record tampering and engaging in organized criminal activity. She will also be fined $10,000 and must serve more than 1,000 hours of community service.

Wooten's attorney Peter Schulte told The Associated Press that Wooten was disappointed with the guilty verdicts, but was "ready to move on with her life."

http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/11/29/41759.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Personally, I think that's a travesty of justice.
Probation for judicial bribery? Should have been 10 years in jail, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why isn't she in jail?
Bribery and corruption is a bit more serious than a drug possession charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. But, isn't that totally legal?
If not, someone better tell congress, they've been doing it forever! Maybe Wooten should sue congress for setting a bad example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kickysnana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. I thought that was business as usual in Texas. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. It is!
I live about 30 miles from McKinney Texas in a town that is now much smaller than McKinney. The "good ole boy" system has always ran our town. If you get in trouble and you have the money, you can get away with anything. No money? You're screwed.

I'm serious as a heart attack. Everyone knows if you use certain attorneys and pay them well, things just "go away".

They give "profit sharing" a whole new meaning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backtoblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. Probation!
Perhaps the judge who sentenced her should be looked into...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. She commits 9 felonies and walks free.
Nice work, if you can get it - I mean, if you're a crook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. Oh, and this is terrific - she took at least $60,000 and gets fined $10,000.
>>The indictments describe six payments, ranging from $10,000 to $50,000, that allegedly were paid from Jan. 4, 2008, to March 14, 2008.<<

When Michael Crichton wrote that "crime pays", he certainly was on the bullseye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. Did she buy this out also? She
was "disappointed with the guilty verdicts" Did she get by all those years and thought she could continue to do so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexYellowDogDem Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
10. No surprise: Another Republican judge
"Wooten defeated longtime incumbent Judge Charles Sandoval in the Republican primary in 2008."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. outrageous...10 years probation?!
:wtf: further proof that the justus system coddles the rich/powerful and punishes the poor/powerless.

Homeless Man Jailed for Stealing Food Freed After 13 Years
And a California man has been freed from prison after serving thirteen years following his arrest for trying to forcibly enter a church soup kitchen because he was hungry. Gregory Taylor had been sentenced to twenty-five years to life in prison under the state’s controversial three-strikes law. At the time of his last arrest, he was homeless and suffering from drug addiction. Taylor’s release came in part due to efforts by students working on the Three Strikes Project at the Criminal Defense Clinic at Stanford Law School. Taylor says he plans to work for a food pantry run by his brother.

http://www.democracynow.org/2010/8/20/headlines/homeless_man_jailed_for_stealing_food_freed_after_13_years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC