Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CA Supreme Court rules Prop 8 proponents do have standing to appeal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 01:09 PM
Original message
CA Supreme Court rules Prop 8 proponents do have standing to appeal
http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2011/11/17/breaking-ca-supreme-court-rules-prop-8-proponents-do-have-standing-to-appeal/

This morning, the CA Supreme Court ruled that the proponents of Prop 8 do have standing under state law to appeal the decision in Perry v. Brown:

… In response to the question submitted by the Ninth Circuit, we conclude, for the reasons discussed above, that when the public officials who ordinarily defend a challenged state law or appeal a judgment invalidating the law decline to do so, under article II, section 8 of the California Constitution and the relevant provisions of the Elections Code, the official proponents of a voter-approved initiative measure are authorized to assert the state’s interest in the initiative’s validity, enabling the proponents to defend the constitutionality of the initiative and to appeal a judgment invalidating the initiative. …
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. So, in other words, the judgment of elected officials is worth crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandySF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. There is a silver lining.
Now, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals will have to hear the core case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Goody! So in another year and a half, we'll win again...
...and then the H8ers wil appeal to the Supremes. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I would have taken the win in CA and called it a day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. They already heard it and deferred ruling until CASC issues it's opinion
They could rule any day now or call more hearings, but they have already heard the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. great
:eyes: the news just sucks today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not unexpected
And, really, from any perspective, if the state isn't willing to defend a proposition then the sponsors should be able to do so. What would happen if voters approved a same sex marriage initiative in, say, Wisconsin, and the governor there decided not to allow his attorney general to defend it from a court challenge?

I want this to have a full legal airing, so there can be no doubt about whether the Constitution is supposed to apply to everyone or just some designated few. It's a fight we have to fight forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC