Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. boosts estimate of auto bailout losses to $23.6B

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 08:47 AM
Original message
U.S. boosts estimate of auto bailout losses to $23.6B
http://www.detnews.com/article/20111114/AUTO01/111140434/1361/U.S.-boosts-estimate-of-auto-bailout-losses-to-$23.6B

The Treasury Department dramatically boosted its estimate of losses from its $85 billion auto industry bailout by more than $9 billion in the face of General Motors Co.'s steep stock decline.

In its monthly report to Congress, the Treasury Department now says it expects to lose $23.6 billion, up from its previous estimate of $14.33 billion.

The Treasury now pegs the cost of the bailout of GM, Chrysler Group LLC and the auto finance companies at $79.6 billion. It no longer includes $5 billion it set aside to guarantee payments to auto suppliers in 2009.

The big increase is a reflection of the sharp decline in the value of GM's share price.

more at link...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. "the cost of the bailout of GM, Chrysler Group LLC and the auto finance companies at $79.6 billion"
$79.6 billion/ 309 million US population = ~ $258 for every man woman and child in the US.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. And the war in Iraq cost us $3236 for every man woman and child in the US.
So far.

Of course, about 3000 American families lost a lot more than $3000, and several hundred thousand Iraqi families did as well.

At least we got something for our $258 investment in the auto bailout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. According to Brown University's Cost of War project...
http://costsofwar.org/

The Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan wars have cost the US at least 3 trillion dollars.
So per person this would be $3 trillion / 309 million = ~ $ 9,709. per man, woman and child in the US.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markpkessinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Nice try ...
Edited on Thu Nov-17-11 10:39 AM by markpkessinger
... but the NET cost would be to divide the loss of $23.9 billion by 309 million, for a result of $77.35 per every man, woman and child. Considering the impact on the economy if those companies had just been permitted to fail, that strikes me as quite a bargain. What's more, for a calculation that puts this into REAL perspective, calculate the net loss of $23.9 billion as a percentage of the total 2010 budget, and then report back to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. That's what the Wall Street Bailout defenders tell me too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markpkessinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Do you have any clue how many related industries rely on the auto industry?
Edited on Thu Nov-17-11 10:47 AM by markpkessinger
And like I said, calculate the net loss of $23.9 billion as a percentage of the country's entire 2010 budget, and you'll see what a microscopic portion of total spending it really was. And the amount pales next to the size of the banking bailouts.

And your cute one-liner fails to address your dishonest use of statistics in not factoring in the portion of the auto bailouts that the government was able to recover, and instead just using the total sticker price.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Your argument assumes that the companies would have gone away if they didn't get governemnt bailouts
They wouldn't have. All we did in Chrysler's case for example is subsidize the purchase of the company by
some rich people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. what have been the cost of not bailing out gm and chrysler?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. People can't have it both ways.
They moan about this,then they moan about no manufacturing in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Both ways are wrong. They have failed. We are creating a different way.
Manufacturing doesn't have to be owned and controlled by multinational corporations with no interest in the communities surrounding their manufacturing sites. That particular structure is completely unnecessary, and has fucked up every resource anywhere in the world it's touched.

When people say they want jobs, they are NOT saying they want corporate slavery, just that it's better than starving and freezing to death in the short term.

The jobs we want are family-wage jobs where
* we know what the project is that we're contributing to, it's not a secret from us
* we're doing the best work we can, we're not trying to rip off our customers with the cheapest crap possible
* we're treated like responsible adults and equal partners, not submissive primates.
* the product is not harmful, and any harmful byproducts are processed, not dumped on the public

It is NOT my employers job to control my behavior after work. On the contrary, it is MY job to control the behavior of the organization that employs me, to an equal degree as any other employee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC