Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Really, really shoddy evidence about Iran's supposed nukes.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 05:18 AM
Original message
Really, really shoddy evidence about Iran's supposed nukes.
http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/289-134/8424-the-holes-in-the-iran-nuke-report

A devastating piece of reporting from Gareth Porter of Inter Press Service follows one of the main pieces of evidence cited in the report to its source. The report, Porter says,

repeated the sensational claim previously reported by news media all over the world that a former Soviet nuclear weapons scientist had helped Iran construct a detonation system that could be used for a nuclear weapon.

But it turns out that the foreign expert, who is not named in the IAEA report but was identified in news reports as Vyacheslav Danilenko, is not a nuclear weapons scientist but one of the top specialists in the world in the production of nanodiamonds by explosives.

In other words, his legitimate reason for being in Iran from 1996-2002 was not a cover, it really was legitimate. As Porter points out, the Washington Think-Tanker who helped spread the word of this "renegade scientist" theory, David Albright, admitted the intelligence claims from an unidentified "member state" that spawned the theory almost certainly came from Israel. Later, that intelligence was incorporated into Amano's findings without any independent verification.

<snip>

Another fount of evidence supporting Amano's report is likely the so-called "laptop of death" allegedly nabbed from an Iranian scientist by US intelligence services in 2005. The smoking gun evidence on the laptop was all written in English, had no reference to official classification, and included graphs made on Microsoft PowerPoint. When this piece of evidence first surfaced in 2007 in connection to the US National Intelligence Estimate on the Iranian nuclear program, it was largely dismissed by IAEA officials and international diplomats as a likely forgery. But that was before Yukiya Amano headed the agency. Indeed, Amano's predecessor El Baradei publicly confirmed that Western Intelligence agencies had sought to exaggerate the threat of the Iranian nuclear program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Joe Donating Member (106 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. We've seen this movie before
KR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. The drumbeats are pounding, as Big Oil and the MIC once again join...
... forces (were they ever separate?) to send Americans off to war. Profits over everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bosonic Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. To play Devil's Advocate
His http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vyacheslav_Danilenko">wikipedia entry is quite specific in stating where he previously worked (nuclear installation known as NII-1011,located in the closed city of Chelyabinsk-70). I'm sure an investigative journalist worth their salt could use this as a starting point of an investigation.

Also the stated nature of his work, miniaturizing the conventional explosive initiator for nuclear weapons is not incompatible with using explosives to generate nanodiamonds. Really they are both applications of the same general skill-set; namely using precisely/symmetrically arranged and timed explosives to produce intense pressures within a volume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. That's a good point
Still doesn't explain why Iranian bureaucrats write each other memos in English.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. Here we go again.
I hope the public will be less gullible this time.

And congress less complicit. (yeah, right)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC