Cain accuser's WITNESS is having a press conference NOW: but where

[pnwmom]

can I find it? I don't see anything about it on CNN or MSNBC.

http://tucsoncitizen.com/usa-today-news/2011/11/14/ex-boyfriend-of-cain-accuser-to-come-forward/

We’re waiting for an ex-boyfriend of Sharon Bialek to hold a news conference in Shreveport, La. about sexual harassment charges against Herman Cain.

The Times newspaper is livestreaming the news conference.

[SpiralHawk]

1. Channel Grope (R)

Right next to Channel Toe-Tapper (R)

on the Republicon Family Values Spectrum of Shame...

[sce56]

9. Unless of course it is on the Fox Noise channel then they'll put a (D) next to Cain's name!

Republican GOV Sanford.

[monmouth]

2. Maybe they're not interested since he isn't an actual victim. I see it

as a she said situation. No evidence, sad as that may be.

[Spazito]

3. The Cain campaign stated she made it up just recently for political purposes...

Dr. Zuckerman coming forward to prove that wrong, that Ms. Bialek DID relate to him what had occurred shortly after the assault proves, yet again, Cain, his campaign team and his supporters lied...again.

Oh, and it is a she said + she said + she said + she said + he said vs he said. A little different than she said vs he said, I think.

[randome]

4. No difference to the die-hard Republican believers.

No matter how many people come forward, it won't make any difference. Where's the videotaped or tape recorded evidence I heard about a couple of weeks ago?

Geeze, some people don't know how to run a proper scandal.

(Not you, Spazito, I mean the people holding news conferences.)

[Spazito]

5. The press conference wasn't aimed at the die-hard Republican...

believers, it was aimed squarely on Cain to come clean and also to the public that are of all political persuasions who should know the facts around this candidate before they cast their vote instead of after.

It is going to be interesting to see what happens next as I got the impression Ms. Allred has more she is prepared to make public if Cain continues to deny the facts around his relationship with her client.

[Bonhomme Richard]

6. My understanding is that he will rebut Cain.....

saying he never met her because this guy was at a dinner they had together.
We'll see.

[pnwmom]

7. Correct. And now Cain's lawyer is trying to walk that back,

claiming that Cain never meant to unequivocally deny having met her -- just saying he didn't remember.

[UTUSN]

8. K&R #3 n/t